07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, there was no significant difference in<br />

VAS at rest after 3 hours. On movement, VAS was<br />

lower in the Preoperative group at 3 hours<br />

(p=0.018) and 6 hours (p=0.047) compared to the<br />

Post-operative group. Again, there was no<br />

significant difference in pain scores at 12 and 24<br />

hours on movement. The analgesia requirement in<br />

the Post-operative group was much higher than<br />

that seen in the Pre-operative group. There were<br />

no adverse effects reported.<br />

Conclusion: This study validates the efficacy of<br />

preemptive Valdecoxib to reduce post-operative<br />

pain and analgesia consumption after<br />

arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament<br />

reconstruction.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #421<br />

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament<br />

Reconstruction: The US Military Academy<br />

Experience<br />

Darryl B. Thomas, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA,<br />

Presenter<br />

Dean C Taylor, West Point, NY USA<br />

Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, NY,<br />

USA<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)<br />

reconstruction, resulting in symptomatic recurrent<br />

instability, occurs in 3-10% of patients. Results of<br />

revision ACL reconstruction are generally inferior<br />

to primary reconstruction. This study was<br />

performed to determine the results of revision<br />

ACL reconstruction at our institution, and to<br />

better identify and address those factors that lead<br />

to primary ACL failure.<br />

METHODS<br />

Thirty-four patients who underwent revision<br />

arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were<br />

retrospectively reviewed. Grafts used for ACL<br />

revision included BTB autografts (76%), HS<br />

autografts (19%), and Achilles allografts (5%). Pre<br />

and post-operative exams included<br />

comprehensive subjective evaluation using the<br />

SANE, Tegner, Lysholm, KOOS, and IKDC scoring<br />

systems. Objective evaluation included manual<br />

laxity testing, instrumented laxity testing,<br />

isokinetic muscle testing, and functional activity<br />

testing. The average age at revision was 26 years<br />

and the average time from primary to revision<br />

surgery was 48 months. Average length of followup<br />

was 60 months. The results of these 34<br />

patients were then compared to a cohort of 42<br />

patients who underwent primary ACL<br />

reconstruction at the same institution.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Anterior laxity was improved in all patients.<br />

Eighty-two percent of patients had less than 5-<br />

mm side-to-side difference on arthrometric<br />

testing, and 78% had either a Grade 0 or grade 1<br />

pivot shift. The mean Tegner score following<br />

revision ACL reconstruction was 5.4, which was<br />

significantly lower than the mean score for those<br />

following primary reconstruction, 8.5 (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!