POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The passive range of flexion was the same in all<br />
cases, although small differences were found in<br />
the initial attitude of the joint in full extension.<br />
The elongation and orientation of the<br />
reconstructed ACL bundles were similar both in<br />
the horizontal and vertical case and differed in<br />
their position and orientation from the central<br />
fibre of the natural ACL, especially in extension.<br />
The anterior bundles of the reconstructed ACL<br />
resulted isometric during PROM, like the normal<br />
ACL central fibre, while the posterior bundle<br />
decreased its length in flexion by almost 20%.<br />
Also the orientation of the anterior bundles of the<br />
reconstructed ligament with respect to the tibial<br />
plateau was similar to the normal one and<br />
decreased in flexion. The orientation of the<br />
posterior bundle of the reconstructed ACL with<br />
respect to the tibial plateau varied much more<br />
during PROM.<br />
The orientation of both anterior and posterior<br />
bundles of the reconstructed ACL with respect to<br />
the femoral notch were quite similar, and<br />
increased less than normal ACL during PROM.<br />
It is interesting to remark that the attitude of the<br />
knee at 90? was slightly different for normal and<br />
reconstructed knees and therefore the elongation<br />
during IE and drawer test showed a different<br />
trend.<br />
This is confirmed by the results of the kinematic<br />
stress tests. In fact AP and IE laxities varied<br />
according to the ACL state, as the mean among all<br />
repeated tests in the same conditions.<br />
Discussion and Conclusions:<br />
The experimental setup was successful in<br />
providing a comparison among normal knee, ACLdeficient<br />
knee and reconstructed knee from the<br />
kinematic point of view, avoiding the problem of<br />
individual variability and lack of data on 3D<br />
kinematics.<br />
In our experiment the ACL elongation and general<br />
orientation of the ligament was restored by both<br />
techniques [2,3]. However only the vertical tunnel<br />
was able to restore the natural AP and IE stability<br />
of the knee. It performed better than the<br />
horizontal one, which appeared unable to fully<br />
control AP laxity and constrained IE rotation more<br />
than the normal ACL.<br />
Therefore a first analysis of the experimental data<br />
showed that the femoral tunnel orientation had a<br />
significant effect on the final knee behaviour,<br />
probably because it produced a different global<br />
length of the used tendon or, although small,<br />
different positions of the antero-medial or<br />
postero-medial bundle of ACL reconstructions. In<br />
fact all the other features of the reconstructions<br />
were the same in the two examined technique (i.e.<br />
the graft, the tibial tunnel, the position of the<br />
anterior and posterior bundle of the reconstructed<br />
ACL).<br />
It can be noticed that this result appears<br />
surprisingly different from the classic single<br />
bundle technique, were the control of AP laxities<br />
increases when the orientation of the femoral part<br />
becomes more horizontal [4]. This result may be<br />
due to the physical behaviour of the tendon<br />
wrapping around the femoral condyle with<br />
different length and therefore forces in the two<br />
double-bundle techniques and absent in the<br />
single-bundle one.<br />
We plan to perform a more extensive experimental<br />
study of this issue in the near future.<br />
References<br />
[1] Martelli S., New Method for simultaneous<br />
anatomical and functional studies of articular<br />
joints and its application to the human knee,<br />
Comp Methods & Programs in Biomed, 70: 223-<br />
240, 2003 .<br />
[2] Zaffagnini S., Martelli S., Acquaroli F.,<br />
Computer investigation of ACL orientation durino<br />
passive range of motion, Computers in Biology<br />
and Med, 34:2, 2004 (to appear)<br />
[3] Sapeva A.A. et al., Testing for Isometry during<br />
reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament,<br />
JBJS 72-A[2]:259-267, 1990<br />
[4] Edwards T. B et al., In vitro comparison of<br />
elongation of the ACL and the single- and dualtunnel<br />
ACL reconstructions, Orthopedics, 22<br />
[6]:577-84 , 1990<br />
E-poster #332<br />
Clinical Outcome and Second-look Findings of<br />
Amateur Athlete with Bi-socket ACL<br />
Reconstruction using Multiple Hamstring<br />
Tendons<br />
Atsushi Inoue, Sapporo, JAPAN, Presenter<br />
Kazuhiko Nakano, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />
Toshiaki Yamamura, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />
Nishioka Daiichi Hospital, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />
Purpose<br />
The purpose of this study is to verify whether<br />
sport activity level of amateur athlete after ACL<br />
reconstruction influences the clinical outcome at<br />
post-operative one year and the graft in secondlook<br />
arthroscopy.<br />
Materials and Methods