07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The passive range of flexion was the same in all<br />

cases, although small differences were found in<br />

the initial attitude of the joint in full extension.<br />

The elongation and orientation of the<br />

reconstructed ACL bundles were similar both in<br />

the horizontal and vertical case and differed in<br />

their position and orientation from the central<br />

fibre of the natural ACL, especially in extension.<br />

The anterior bundles of the reconstructed ACL<br />

resulted isometric during PROM, like the normal<br />

ACL central fibre, while the posterior bundle<br />

decreased its length in flexion by almost 20%.<br />

Also the orientation of the anterior bundles of the<br />

reconstructed ligament with respect to the tibial<br />

plateau was similar to the normal one and<br />

decreased in flexion. The orientation of the<br />

posterior bundle of the reconstructed ACL with<br />

respect to the tibial plateau varied much more<br />

during PROM.<br />

The orientation of both anterior and posterior<br />

bundles of the reconstructed ACL with respect to<br />

the femoral notch were quite similar, and<br />

increased less than normal ACL during PROM.<br />

It is interesting to remark that the attitude of the<br />

knee at 90? was slightly different for normal and<br />

reconstructed knees and therefore the elongation<br />

during IE and drawer test showed a different<br />

trend.<br />

This is confirmed by the results of the kinematic<br />

stress tests. In fact AP and IE laxities varied<br />

according to the ACL state, as the mean among all<br />

repeated tests in the same conditions.<br />

Discussion and Conclusions:<br />

The experimental setup was successful in<br />

providing a comparison among normal knee, ACLdeficient<br />

knee and reconstructed knee from the<br />

kinematic point of view, avoiding the problem of<br />

individual variability and lack of data on 3D<br />

kinematics.<br />

In our experiment the ACL elongation and general<br />

orientation of the ligament was restored by both<br />

techniques [2,3]. However only the vertical tunnel<br />

was able to restore the natural AP and IE stability<br />

of the knee. It performed better than the<br />

horizontal one, which appeared unable to fully<br />

control AP laxity and constrained IE rotation more<br />

than the normal ACL.<br />

Therefore a first analysis of the experimental data<br />

showed that the femoral tunnel orientation had a<br />

significant effect on the final knee behaviour,<br />

probably because it produced a different global<br />

length of the used tendon or, although small,<br />

different positions of the antero-medial or<br />

postero-medial bundle of ACL reconstructions. In<br />

fact all the other features of the reconstructions<br />

were the same in the two examined technique (i.e.<br />

the graft, the tibial tunnel, the position of the<br />

anterior and posterior bundle of the reconstructed<br />

ACL).<br />

It can be noticed that this result appears<br />

surprisingly different from the classic single<br />

bundle technique, were the control of AP laxities<br />

increases when the orientation of the femoral part<br />

becomes more horizontal [4]. This result may be<br />

due to the physical behaviour of the tendon<br />

wrapping around the femoral condyle with<br />

different length and therefore forces in the two<br />

double-bundle techniques and absent in the<br />

single-bundle one.<br />

We plan to perform a more extensive experimental<br />

study of this issue in the near future.<br />

References<br />

[1] Martelli S., New Method for simultaneous<br />

anatomical and functional studies of articular<br />

joints and its application to the human knee,<br />

Comp Methods & Programs in Biomed, 70: 223-<br />

240, 2003 .<br />

[2] Zaffagnini S., Martelli S., Acquaroli F.,<br />

Computer investigation of ACL orientation durino<br />

passive range of motion, Computers in Biology<br />

and Med, 34:2, 2004 (to appear)<br />

[3] Sapeva A.A. et al., Testing for Isometry during<br />

reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament,<br />

JBJS 72-A[2]:259-267, 1990<br />

[4] Edwards T. B et al., In vitro comparison of<br />

elongation of the ACL and the single- and dualtunnel<br />

ACL reconstructions, Orthopedics, 22<br />

[6]:577-84 , 1990<br />

E-poster #332<br />

Clinical Outcome and Second-look Findings of<br />

Amateur Athlete with Bi-socket ACL<br />

Reconstruction using Multiple Hamstring<br />

Tendons<br />

Atsushi Inoue, Sapporo, JAPAN, Presenter<br />

Kazuhiko Nakano, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />

Toshiaki Yamamura, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />

Nishioka Daiichi Hospital, Sapporo, JAPAN<br />

Purpose<br />

The purpose of this study is to verify whether<br />

sport activity level of amateur athlete after ACL<br />

reconstruction influences the clinical outcome at<br />

post-operative one year and the graft in secondlook<br />

arthroscopy.<br />

Materials and Methods

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!