07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

athletes. The proper treatment of these structures<br />

in combination with the ACL’s can have excellent<br />

and good results, similar to those of isolated ACL<br />

reconstructions.<br />

E-poster #342<br />

Loss of Extension Following ACL<br />

Reconstruction: Analysis of Incidence and<br />

Etiology Using New IKDC Criteria<br />

Craig S Mauro, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Presenter<br />

Mauricio F. Herrera, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

James J Irrgang, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

Kimberly Francis, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

Christopher D Harner, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA<br />

Objective: In 1992, we reported our incidence of<br />

loss of extension (LOE) (>=10 ) to be 11.1% at 2<br />

months postoperatively. By avoiding acute<br />

surgery, we decreased our incidence to 1.7% in<br />

1995. In 2000, the International Knee<br />

Documentation Committee (IKDC) redefined a<br />

nearly normal passive motion deficit<br />

postoperatively to be a side-to-side difference<br />

5 side-toside<br />

difference in passive knee extension or the<br />

need for repeat arthroscopy or a drop out cast to<br />

alleviate LOE.<br />

Results: The overall incidence of LOE was 25.3%<br />

(58 of 229). Thirteen point three per cent (28 of<br />

233) of patients required arthroscopy to recover<br />

full extension. LOE was significantly associated<br />

with preoperative extension (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!