POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Although softball has become one of the most<br />
popular sports in recent years, more attention has<br />
been directed to shoulder injuries in baseball<br />
pitchers, focusing on the biomechanics and<br />
muscle firing patterns associated with that sport.<br />
Research on the overhand pitch has identified<br />
critical instances during the pitching motion<br />
where injuries occur, and with proper<br />
intervention, may be prevented. However, there is<br />
very little information pertaining to softball<br />
pitchers and the biomechanics of the underhand<br />
windmill pitch. Due to the paucity of literature<br />
about the biomechanics of the windmill softball<br />
pitch, phases and motions of the pitch have not<br />
been standardized. By developing a better<br />
understanding of the mechanics, we can identify<br />
at-risk tissues leading to better diagnosis of<br />
injuries and more specific rehabilitation and<br />
conditioning programs. The purpose of this study<br />
was to determine the kinematics of the windmill<br />
softball pitch with video analysis. Digitizing<br />
software was used to find shoulder position at<br />
stride foot contact, elbow angle at ball release,<br />
shoulder angular velocities through different<br />
intervals, and ball speed at ball release, as these<br />
variables have been associated with risks of<br />
shoulder injury and performance.<br />
Five healthy, female, high school student<br />
athletes participated in this study. Kinematic<br />
data was taken from 6 pitches from each of the 5<br />
subjects with three digital camcorders. Reference<br />
points were subjects’ bilateral feet, ankles, knees,<br />
hips, shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, as well as<br />
her chin, forehead and the ball. These landmarks<br />
were used to calculate angular velocity and linear<br />
displacement of different joints and/or segments<br />
throughout the pitch. Data also helped us<br />
establish different measurements per athlete,<br />
averages, and standard deviation among athletes<br />
in shoulder and knee position at stride foot<br />
contact, elbow position at ball release, ball speed,<br />
and angular velocity of the arm at each phase of<br />
the pitch. A Pearson product moment correlation<br />
was used to determine if there was any correlation<br />
between these measurements and ball speed.<br />
Only knee position at stride foot contact had a<br />
significant correlation of -0.967 with ball speed.<br />
The average stride length of the five subjects was<br />
40.84 with a standard deviation of 1.88, with an<br />
average body height to stride ratio of 63.5%.<br />
Average shoulder angle and knee angle at stride<br />
foot contact was 133 degrees and 32 degrees with<br />
a standard deviation of 15 degrees and 5 degrees,<br />
respectively. Elbow angle at ball release averaged<br />
9 degrees with a standard deviation of 0.8<br />
degrees. Ball speed averaged 54.88 mph with a<br />
standard deviation of 6.5 mph.<br />
As determined from our results, knee angle at<br />
stride foot contact inversely influences ball speed.<br />
Angular velocity may influence ball speed, but can<br />
be affected by other variables.<br />
E-poster w/ Standard #827<br />
The Influence of Knee Replacement Type on<br />
Joint Proprioception; Total versus<br />
Unicompartmental Replacement<br />
Sherif Mouneir Isaac, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />
Presenter<br />
Karen Barker, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Irini Nabil Danial, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED<br />
KINGDOM<br />
David Beard, Headington, Oxford, UNITED<br />
KINGDOM<br />
Richie Gill, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Max Gibbons, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Christopher Dodd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UNITED<br />
KINGDOM<br />
David Murray, Headington, Oxford, UNITED<br />
KINGDOM<br />
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust, Oxford,<br />
UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Introduction:<br />
Proprioception protects joints against injurious<br />
movements and is critical for joint stability<br />
maintenance under dynamic conditions. Knee<br />
replacement effect on proprioception in general<br />
remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the<br />
changes in proprioceptive performance after knee<br />
replacement; comparing Total (TKA) to<br />
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).<br />
Methods and Materials<br />
Thirty-four patients with osteoarthritis were<br />
recruited; 15 patients underwent TKA using the<br />
AGC prosthesis and 19 patients underwent UKA<br />
using the Oxford prosthesis. Both cruciate<br />
ligaments were preserved in the UKA group, while<br />
only the PCL was preserved in TKA patients.<br />
Patients’ age was similar in both groups.<br />
Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were<br />
used as measures of proprioception. Both groups<br />
were assessed pre- and 6 months post-operatively<br />
in both limbs. JPS was measured as the error in<br />
actively and passively reproducing five randomly<br />
ordered knee flexion angles between 30 and 70<br />
using an isokinetic dynamometer. Postural sway<br />
(area and path) was measured during single leg<br />
stance using a Balance Performance Monitor.