07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although softball has become one of the most<br />

popular sports in recent years, more attention has<br />

been directed to shoulder injuries in baseball<br />

pitchers, focusing on the biomechanics and<br />

muscle firing patterns associated with that sport.<br />

Research on the overhand pitch has identified<br />

critical instances during the pitching motion<br />

where injuries occur, and with proper<br />

intervention, may be prevented. However, there is<br />

very little information pertaining to softball<br />

pitchers and the biomechanics of the underhand<br />

windmill pitch. Due to the paucity of literature<br />

about the biomechanics of the windmill softball<br />

pitch, phases and motions of the pitch have not<br />

been standardized. By developing a better<br />

understanding of the mechanics, we can identify<br />

at-risk tissues leading to better diagnosis of<br />

injuries and more specific rehabilitation and<br />

conditioning programs. The purpose of this study<br />

was to determine the kinematics of the windmill<br />

softball pitch with video analysis. Digitizing<br />

software was used to find shoulder position at<br />

stride foot contact, elbow angle at ball release,<br />

shoulder angular velocities through different<br />

intervals, and ball speed at ball release, as these<br />

variables have been associated with risks of<br />

shoulder injury and performance.<br />

Five healthy, female, high school student<br />

athletes participated in this study. Kinematic<br />

data was taken from 6 pitches from each of the 5<br />

subjects with three digital camcorders. Reference<br />

points were subjects’ bilateral feet, ankles, knees,<br />

hips, shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, as well as<br />

her chin, forehead and the ball. These landmarks<br />

were used to calculate angular velocity and linear<br />

displacement of different joints and/or segments<br />

throughout the pitch. Data also helped us<br />

establish different measurements per athlete,<br />

averages, and standard deviation among athletes<br />

in shoulder and knee position at stride foot<br />

contact, elbow position at ball release, ball speed,<br />

and angular velocity of the arm at each phase of<br />

the pitch. A Pearson product moment correlation<br />

was used to determine if there was any correlation<br />

between these measurements and ball speed.<br />

Only knee position at stride foot contact had a<br />

significant correlation of -0.967 with ball speed.<br />

The average stride length of the five subjects was<br />

40.84 with a standard deviation of 1.88, with an<br />

average body height to stride ratio of 63.5%.<br />

Average shoulder angle and knee angle at stride<br />

foot contact was 133 degrees and 32 degrees with<br />

a standard deviation of 15 degrees and 5 degrees,<br />

respectively. Elbow angle at ball release averaged<br />

9 degrees with a standard deviation of 0.8<br />

degrees. Ball speed averaged 54.88 mph with a<br />

standard deviation of 6.5 mph.<br />

As determined from our results, knee angle at<br />

stride foot contact inversely influences ball speed.<br />

Angular velocity may influence ball speed, but can<br />

be affected by other variables.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #827<br />

The Influence of Knee Replacement Type on<br />

Joint Proprioception; Total versus<br />

Unicompartmental Replacement<br />

Sherif Mouneir Isaac, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />

Presenter<br />

Karen Barker, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Irini Nabil Danial, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM<br />

David Beard, Headington, Oxford, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM<br />

Richie Gill, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Max Gibbons, Oxford, Oxon, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Christopher Dodd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM<br />

David Murray, Headington, Oxford, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM<br />

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust, Oxford,<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Introduction:<br />

Proprioception protects joints against injurious<br />

movements and is critical for joint stability<br />

maintenance under dynamic conditions. Knee<br />

replacement effect on proprioception in general<br />

remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the<br />

changes in proprioceptive performance after knee<br />

replacement; comparing Total (TKA) to<br />

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).<br />

Methods and Materials<br />

Thirty-four patients with osteoarthritis were<br />

recruited; 15 patients underwent TKA using the<br />

AGC prosthesis and 19 patients underwent UKA<br />

using the Oxford prosthesis. Both cruciate<br />

ligaments were preserved in the UKA group, while<br />

only the PCL was preserved in TKA patients.<br />

Patients’ age was similar in both groups.<br />

Joint Position Sense (JPS) and postural sway were<br />

used as measures of proprioception. Both groups<br />

were assessed pre- and 6 months post-operatively<br />

in both limbs. JPS was measured as the error in<br />

actively and passively reproducing five randomly<br />

ordered knee flexion angles between 30 and 70<br />

using an isokinetic dynamometer. Postural sway<br />

(area and path) was measured during single leg<br />

stance using a Balance Performance Monitor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!