07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

injury testing within one week of injury (mean=2.0<br />

days). Abnormal test performance was determined<br />

by the application of reliable change index scores<br />

(RCI’s). 65% of concussed athletes reported a<br />

significant increase in symptoms compared to<br />

baseline. 35% of the subjects did not report<br />

increased symptoms. However, 82% of the<br />

concussed sample did demonstrate significantly<br />

poorer neuropsychological test results, as<br />

measured by the Verbal Memory, Visual Memory,<br />

Reaction Time or Processing Speed indices from<br />

ImPACT. Therefore, the addition of<br />

neuropsychological testing resulted in a net<br />

increase in sensitivity of 17%. The combined<br />

sensitivity of symptoms reporting and<br />

neuropsychological testing was 88%. Reliance on<br />

player self-reported post-concussive symptoms is<br />

likely to result in poor diagnostic sensitivity and is<br />

also likely to result in the premature return to play<br />

by concussed athletes. The addition of a<br />

computer-based neuropsychological protocol<br />

increases diagnostic sensitivity significantly. The<br />

careful evaluation of both player symptoms and<br />

neuropsychological test results represents the<br />

most useful approach to concussion<br />

management.<br />

using the ImPACT computer -based test battery.<br />

We compared two groups: first concussion (N=<br />

155) and athletes who sustained ?? concussion<br />

(N=46) based on Verbal-, Visual memory,<br />

Processing speed, Reaction time and Symptoms<br />

composite score.<br />

Results: Comparing the No concussion History<br />

group to the History of concussion group did<br />

show increase in on field -symptoms for the<br />

history group. But there is neither significant<br />

difference in their neurocognitive performance nor<br />

for their symptoms looking at 2 days and 7 days<br />

post injury.<br />

Discussion: Athletes who had experienced a<br />

concussion in the past did not perform worse on<br />

neuropsychological testing than athletes with no<br />

History of concussion. Neither did the group differ<br />

on their on- field symptoms. These results suggest<br />

that if an athlete has symptom free period<br />

between his concussions he is likely to recover<br />

without any residual problems.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #1112<br />

Effect of Multiple Concussions<br />

Derk Anton van Kampen, Deventer,<br />

NETHERLANDS, Presenter<br />

Mark R Lovell, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

Michael W. Collins, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

Freddie H. Fu, Pittsburgh, PA USA<br />

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,<br />

Pittsburgh, PA, USA<br />

Introduction: The management of concussion has<br />

become a public health issue since approximately<br />

300,000 concussions occur a year in the USA a<br />

lone. Most discussion is focused on return to play<br />

decision-making, based on the athletes symptoms<br />

and neurocognitive performance. Currently there<br />

is no consensus on the risk of having multiple<br />

concussions although general previous studies<br />

have shown an indication for decline of<br />

performance. The current study was designed to<br />

evaluate the importance of a history of<br />

concussions on a new concussion based on<br />

neuropsychological test performance, conducted<br />

at 2 days and 7 days post injury.<br />

Method: A group of 201 High school and college<br />

athletes were tested pre-season, 2 days and 7 days<br />

post concussion. All the athletes were evaluated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!