07.03.2014 Views

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

POSTER ABSTRACTS - ISAKOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and efficacy of simultaneous bilateral revision<br />

TKA.<br />

Methods: This study cohort included 40 knees in<br />

20 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral<br />

revision arthroplasty for aseptic failure of a total<br />

knee arthroplasty under the same anesthetic. The<br />

study group was compared to two similar control<br />

groups of 40 knees in 20 patients who underwent<br />

staged bilateral total knee revision arthroplasty<br />

and 20 knees in 20 patients who underwent<br />

unilateral total knee revision arthroplasty.<br />

Follow-up averaged 4 (range, 3-5) years in the<br />

study group and 8 (range, 6-12) years in the<br />

control groups. Clinical and radiographic results<br />

were evaluated by the Knee Society rating system.<br />

Results: Average knee scores improved by 41<br />

points for the revision TKA in the study group, 38<br />

points in the staged group, and 39 points in the<br />

unilateral group. Range of motion improved from<br />

8-85 degrees to 2-115 degrees and tourniquet<br />

times averaged 57 minutes (range 37-78 minutes).<br />

There were no lasting adverse cardiovascular or<br />

thromboembolic complications. However, there<br />

was one transient episode of post-operative<br />

confusion that was attributed to fat embolism.<br />

Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral revision total<br />

knee arthroplasty has a favorable outcome.<br />

Although the need for simultaneous bilateral<br />

revision knee arthroplasty may be rare. It may be<br />

a viable option in carefully selected patients.<br />

Furthermore, these results suggest that this<br />

combined procedure is a safe and favorable<br />

alternative to staged revision total knee<br />

arthroplasty.<br />

E-poster w/ Standard #556<br />

Outcomes of an Arthroscopic Treatment<br />

Regimen for Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee<br />

J. Richard Steadman, Vail, CO, USA<br />

Arun Ramappa, Vail, CO USA Presenter<br />

Timothy S Bollom, Vail, CO USA<br />

Karen K Briggs, Vail, CO USA<br />

William G Rodkey, Vail, CO USA<br />

Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Foundation,<br />

Vail, CO, USA<br />

Introduction: Recently the benefits of arthroscopy<br />

for the treatment of osteoarthritis(OA) of the knee<br />

have been questioned. Although joint<br />

replacement has yielded successful results, many<br />

patients wish to delay this procedure. In addition,<br />

knee arthroplasty at a physiologically young age<br />

has significant long term implications.<br />

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to<br />

evaluate the functional and subjective outcomes<br />

of patients with severe OA of the knee who<br />

underwent a comprehensive arthroscopic<br />

treatment and physical therapy regimen.<br />

Methods: Between August 2000 and November<br />

2001, 90 knees in 81 patients were treated with a<br />

novel arthroscopic regimen. Inclusion criteria<br />

included severe osteoarthritis, as defined by a<br />

Kellgren-Lawrence Score of 3 or 4, and minimum 2<br />

year follow-up. Under anesthesia, prior to<br />

arthroscopy, knees were insufflated with an<br />

average of 170cc of sterile saline (range 120 to<br />

240). The arthroscopic treatment consisted of:<br />

lysis of adhesions, anterior interval<br />

release(interval between patella and tibia),<br />

contouring of cartilage defects to a stable rim,<br />

shaping of meniscus tears to a stable rim, limited<br />

synovectomy, removal of loose bodies, removal of<br />

osteophytes that affected terminal extension, and<br />

careful homeostasis prior to removal of the<br />

arthroscope. This was followed by a strict physical<br />

therapy regimen that included partial weightbearing<br />

post-operatively, early achievement of full<br />

range of motion, and maintenance of patellar<br />

mobility. Exclusion criteria included treatment of<br />

chondral defects with microfracture. All patients<br />

completed a pre-operative questionnaire and<br />

follow-up questionnaire. Failure of the<br />

arthroscopic protocol was defined as knees<br />

requiring arthroplasty due to lack of improvement<br />

in symptoms.<br />

Results: The average patient age was 57 (range 37<br />

to 78), with 51 males and 39 females. Patients<br />

had an average of 1.5 previous surgeries (range 0<br />

to 12). The average pre-operative Lysholm score<br />

was 51 (range 14 to 90) and the average Tegner<br />

activity level was 3 (range 1 to 9). Knees had an<br />

average of 3.4 mm of medial joint space and 6.2<br />

mm of lateral joint space on the AP view. On the<br />

AP view at 45o of flexion, the average medial joint<br />

space was 3.4 mm and the lateral joint space was<br />

4.6 mm. The weight bearing axis (WBA) was<br />

defined as a line between the center of the hip<br />

and center of the talus. The distance between the<br />

point the WBA crosses the knee joint and the<br />

center of the knee was noted. This distance<br />

divided by the width of the compartment that the<br />

WBA intersected was defined as the shift in the<br />

WBA. The average shift in the WBA was 42%<br />

(range 0 to 129%).<br />

Nine knees failed at an average time from<br />

surgery of 24 months (range 17 to 31 months.<br />

There was no difference in any pre-operative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!