0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
effects became nonsignificant (although still in the right direction). It appears that critics were<br />
right: proper diagnosis of treatment effects requires separate consideration of program graduates<br />
and failures (Austin, 1998). It is not enough to simply expose an inmate to TC; he/she must<br />
successhlly complete it to enjoy any significant, lasting advantage. TC graduates who maintained<br />
full time employment after release from prison had the lowest reincarceration rates overall.<br />
Survival analyses showed visible effects of TC primarily after 12 months, although hazard rates<br />
began to rise sharply after 6 - 9 months.<br />
In contrast to findings for reincarceration, TC had no significant effect on rearrests.<br />
Arrests, of course, may or may not result in formal charges, convictions, or reincarcerations.<br />
Reincarceration may simply be a more reliable indicator of post-release outcome. No significant<br />
interactions between TC and other variables (e.g., institutional setting, employment status) were<br />
@<br />
found. However, full-time employment following release from prison once again showed a<br />
significant effect in lowering the likelihood of rearrest.<br />
Last, but not least, we examined the effects of TC and other variables on parole outcomes<br />
including drug testing. Thirty-six percent of inmates in the TC group and 39% of inmates in the<br />
Comparison group had at least one positive drug test during the at-risk period. Although a<br />
positive drug test does not necessarily result in a technical parole violation (TPV), a new offense,<br />
a new arrest, or a new reincarceration, high relapse rates are certainly of concern. Relapse rates<br />
were sigrdicantly higher for two of the five institutions examined, the only instance in which we<br />
found any significant effect of institutional setting on treatment outcomes. Employment had a<br />
strong effect on reducing the likelihood of relapse. Inmates who were employed full-time during<br />
the at-risk period were half as likely to test positive for drug use.<br />
131<br />
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.