29.04.2014 Views

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

current TC inmates (REST and CRC forms), and post-release data collection for all inmates<br />

proceeded as planned through the end of the study period.<br />

Response rates for TC samples (Le., completion of Consent, Drug Screen and REST<br />

forms) were consistently excellent (548/637 = 86%)24. We attribute this high response rate to two<br />

major factors. First, TC is an intensive, one-year residential program. Many new TC inmates are<br />

highly motivated and interested in recovery when they begin TC, and self-assessment is a critical<br />

I<br />

I<br />

requirement of their early treatment work. Second, experienced treatment counselors have<br />

fiequent, daily contact with TC inmates, and counselors tend to form stronger therapeutic<br />

relationships (and trust) with TC inmates. Both factors likely enhanced our TC response rates.<br />

Response rates for inmates in the Comparison samples (Subject Consent forms and TCU<br />

e<br />

Drug Screen forms) fluctuated over time, but never equaled those of TC (1030/2029 = 51%). As<br />

noted above, inmates participated in non-residential Education and Outpatient programs for much<br />

shorter time periods than TC, they tended to have less time remaining in their sentences, and they<br />

tended to develop weaker therapeutic relationships (and trust) with their counselors. Indeed,<br />

counselors reported a higher degree of suspicion and mistrust among inmates in the Education<br />

and Outpatient groups. They also reported that it was more dficult to overcome this suspicion<br />

due to their relatively intiequent contact with inmates (1 - 3 hours of group time per week).<br />

Because of the lower response rate for the Comparison sample, care was taken in data analyses to<br />

examine and control for selection differences potentially related to recidivism (e.g., prior and<br />

current offense severity, and assessed need for treatment).<br />

0<br />

24 The number of inmates approached (shown here) is less than the number of inmates admitted<br />

(Table 2). Many inmates admitted to D & A programs during the study period were either<br />

transferred or unsuccessfblly discharged prior to completing their first month of treatment. As<br />

such, they would not have been approached for participation in the study.<br />

79<br />

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />

been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />

and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!