29.04.2014 Views

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a<br />

similar, ranging from 25% (TC) to 30% (Outpatient). l7<br />

treatment programs as of March 1,2002. The failure rates for different program types were<br />

Table 4<br />

Number and TyDe of Treatment Program Discharges from AOD Programs at Five Prisons<br />

Education Outpatient TC Alumni Total<br />

Successful 815 448 470 36 1769<br />

(72%) (52%) (64%) (30%) (62%)<br />

Unsuccessful 308 263 185 33 789<br />

(27%) (30%) (25%) (28%) (28%)<br />

Direct Parole 5<br />

115 72 39 231<br />

(0%) (13%) (10%)<br />

(33%) (8%)<br />

Other 3<br />

44 11 11 69<br />

(0%) (5 yo) ( 1 Yo) (9%) (2%)<br />

Total 1131 870 738 119 2858<br />

(100%) 100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)<br />

Note. “Other” includes programmatic discharges beyond the control of the inmate, including institutional transfer,<br />

writ or court order, medical discharge, etc. “Direct Parole” indicates inmates who received parole as the reason for<br />

their treatment program discharge. In other words, such inmates were paroled directly fiom their treatment<br />

program. These figures are unrelated to the number of inmates who may eventually apply for (or receive) parole at<br />

a later date following completion of their substance abuse programs.<br />

As expected, the experimental and comparison groups differed considerably on total<br />

treatment exposure (Table 5). Treatment exposure was calculated for each inmate in the sample<br />

by multiplying the number of weeks he spent in each treatment program by the program’s<br />

intensity (number of hours of treatment programming per week). TC inmates in general had more<br />

than 10 times as much total treatment exposure as inmates in the Education or Outpatient groups,<br />

thus providing a strong rationale for the formation of comparison groups. Total treatment<br />

exposure can also be entered as a control variable in multivariate analyses, although care needs to<br />

be exercised since program type is highly associated with treatment exposure.<br />

a<br />

l7<br />

As noted earlier, successfbl and unsuccesshl discharges were analyzed separately in outcome<br />

analyses in order to help address shortcomings of previous evaluation studies.<br />

62<br />

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />

been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />

and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!