0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e<br />
until they are mandated to go, some minimum release dates in the DOC database are incorrect or<br />
outdated (e.g., if an inmate completed one sentence but then began a new one without ever being<br />
released), some inmates may have been released on parole and returned for technical violations,<br />
without having a new minimum release date set. Our recidivism data suggest the latter<br />
explanation. As a result, the minimum release date of record is not necessarily a reliable indicator<br />
of TC eligibility, in spite of written policies specif4ring its use.<br />
We also found significant differences in prior and current offense severity (Table 8).<br />
Waymart recruited somewhat lower risk inmates than the other programs.2o Huntingdon admitted<br />
the highest risk inmates. Assessed level of need for treatment was high, regardless of which<br />
instrument was examined (PACSI or TCU Drug Screen). TCU Drug Screen results, however,<br />
suggested that Huntingdon, Graterford and Cresson recruited the highest need inmates.<br />
0<br />
We then examined program duration for both graduates and failures (i.e., early<br />
terminations). Cresson had the highest mean duration for program graduates at 85.7 weeks. The<br />
other institutions were in between (52- 59 weeks), with the exception of Waymart, which had a<br />
mean duration of 42 weeks for successful program graduates. The five TC programs did not differ<br />
significantly on program duration for failures, although all five programs took a long time to make<br />
a decision about termination. At Cresson, the average amount of time spent in the TC prior to<br />
being terminated was 32 weeks.<br />
*O Waymart is a Level 2 security classification; Cresson and Houtzdale are Level 3 facilities;<br />
Graterford and Huntingdon are Level 4 facilities.<br />
71<br />
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.