0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
~ ~~<br />
a<br />
Table 5<br />
Treatment Exposure: Total Number of Hours bv Propram Tvpe<br />
I<br />
Education Outpatient TC Alumni Total<br />
N 1080 826 723 118 2747<br />
Mean 32.0 79.2 836.6 51.1 258.8<br />
Std. Deviation 57.8 138.1 545.7 52.9 452.9<br />
Std. Error 1.8 4.8 20.3 4.9 8.6<br />
95% Confidence Interval<br />
for Mean<br />
Lower Bound 28.6 69.8 796.8 41.4 241.8<br />
Upper Bound 35.5 88.6 876.4 60.7 275.7<br />
i<br />
The sample can also be described in terms of several important risk factors (e.g., prior and<br />
current offense history, assessed level of need for drug treatment, age) and program selection<br />
criteria (e.g., time remaining to minimum release date). Table 6 provides descriptive information<br />
for inmates in the four program types.<br />
Age at time of admission was calculated by subtracting the inmate’s birth date from the<br />
date of program admission. DOC supplied time remaining to minimum release date, a primary<br />
program selection criterion, as part of monthly data runs on all program admissions. Likewise,<br />
DOC, based on the Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission Guidelines, supplied current and prior<br />
offense gravity scores. Standardized drug scores, as noted earlier, were calculated based on the<br />
inmate’s TCU Drug Screen score, ifavailable, or the inmate’s PACSI score, ifthe TCU was not<br />
available. Because the TCU is a 0-9 scale, and the PACSI (the former DOC drug screening<br />
instrument prior to Jan. 1,2001) is a 0-10 scale, scores were transformed into standardized z-<br />
scores and saved for analyses. Using one-way ANOVA, means were compared for each of the<br />
program descriptors shown in Table 6.<br />
63<br />
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.