0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Johnson, B.D., Goldstein, P.J., Preble, E., Schmeidler, J., Lipton, D.S., Spunt, B. and Miller,T.<br />
(1985). Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Abusers. Lexington,<br />
MA. Lexington Books.<br />
Jones, Peter R. (1996) “Risk Prediction in <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>.” In Alan T. Harland (ed.), Choosing<br />
Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the SuDrily. Thousand<br />
Oaks, CA: Sage.<br />
Knight, K., Holcolm, M., and Simpson, D. D. (1994). TCU riychosocial hctioning and<br />
motivation scales: Manual on Dsychometric properties. Fort Worth Texas Christian<br />
University, Institute of Behavioral Research.<br />
Knight, K., Simpson, D.D., Chatham, L.R., and Camacho, L.M. (1977) “An Assessment of<br />
0<br />
Prison-Based Drug Treatment: Texas’ In-Prison Therapeutic Community Program.” Journal<br />
of Offender Rehabilitation 24:75-100.<br />
Knight, K., Simpson, D., & Hiller, M. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes in-prison<br />
therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal 79,321-33.<br />
Kressel, D., Zompa, D., and DeLeon, G. (2002). A statewide integrated quality assurance model<br />
for correctional-based therapeutic community programs. Offender Substance Abuse Report<br />
2(4): 49-50,60-64.<br />
Lichter, Daniel T. (1989). Race, employment hardship, and inequality in the American<br />
nonmetropolitan South. American Sociological Review 54:436-446.<br />
Linhorst, D.M., Knight, K., Johnston, J.S., and Trickey, M. (2001). Situational innuences on the<br />
implementation of a prison-based therapeutic community. The Prison Journal 81,436-453.<br />
e<br />
Lipton, Douglas S. and Frank S. Pearson (1 998) “The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment<br />
Revisited: Preliminary Meta-Analytic Findings fiom the CDATE Study.” Paper presented at<br />
153<br />
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.