0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

Broome, K. M., Knight, K., Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1996). “Evaluating the drug-abusing
probationer: Clinical interview versus self-administered assessment.” Criminal Justice and
Behavior, 23(4), 593-606.
Broome, K. M., Knight, D. K., Knight, K., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D. D. (1997). “Peer,
Family, And Motivational Influences On Drug Treatment Process And Recidivism For
Probationers.” Journal Of Clinical Psycholoa 53: 387-397.
Cantor, D. and Lynch, J.P. (2000). “Self-report surveys as measures of crime and criminal
victimization.” In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000, Volume 4 (pp. 85-138).
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute
of Justice (NCJ-182411).
0
Chaiken, M.R. (1 989). In-Prison Programs for Drug-Involved Offenders. Research in Brief.
Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Chien, I. (1 980). “Psychological, social, and epidemiological factors in juvenile drug use.” In D.J.
Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary
perspectives (NIDA Research Monograph 30, DHHS Publication No. ADM80-967).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Clear, T.R., Rose, D.R., and Ryder, J.A. (2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem
of removing and returning offenders. Crime and Delinquency 47,335-35 1.
Czuchry, M. L., Dansereau, D. F., Sia, T. S., and Simpson, D. D. (1998). “Using Peer, Self, And
Counselor Ratings To Evaluate Treatment Process.’’ Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 30: 81 -
87.
DeLeon, G. (2000). The therapeutic community: Theory. model and method. New York:
Springer.
149
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.