29.04.2014 Views

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two other types of measures were collected for TC inmates who agreed to participate in<br />

the study: the Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) form (completed by inmates),<br />

and the Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) form (completed by AOD staff). All inmates who<br />

completed the Subject Consent form and Drug Screen (86% of all TC admissions) also completed<br />

the initial REST. All TC inmates who initially agreed to participate in the study and still remained<br />

in the TC six months later and 12 months later (100%) agreed to be re-tested on the REST. CRC<br />

response rates were close to 100% across CRC administrations at 1 month, 6 months, and 12<br />

months (the only exceptions being those inmates who were transferred or paroled before they<br />

could be re-a~sessed).~~<br />

All subscales of the CRC and REST (see Methods section) utilized seven-point Likert<br />

e<br />

scales. Response categories for each item ranged from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly<br />

Agree). Using procedures described by Knight et al. (1994) and Simpson (1 991), each scale was<br />

scored by averaging responses to items and multiplying by 10 (scores therefore ranged fiom 10 to<br />

70). Following scoring procedures, several negatively worded items were reverse scored prior to<br />

calculating scale scores for the REST and CRC.26 This procedure resulted in a standardized score<br />

for each scale, allowing for comparisons across different scales and samples. Each instrument was<br />

administered after approximately one month following admission to the TC, 6 months postadmission,<br />

and 12 months post-admission.<br />

25 We express great gratitude to AOD staff and supervisors for their cooperation and perseverance<br />

in the testing process. A study of this magnitude would not have been possible without their<br />

assistance. Initially, there were some misunderstandings about the appropriate testing procedures<br />

and timing for administering the REST and CRC forms, but discussions with supervisors and staff<br />

at each institution and discussions within the larger Steering Committee helped answer questions<br />

and alleviate concerns considerably.<br />

26 Reverse-scored items on the REST included items on the following subscales: SelfEsteem<br />

(#23,33,51,60), Depression (#28), SelfEfficacy (#6, 11, 17,25,32), Risk Taking (#31,48,57),<br />

80<br />

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />

been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />

and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!