29.04.2014 Views

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finding: Of the three major outcomes examined, TC sigmficantly reduced the likelihood of<br />

reincarceration alone. Post-release employment was strongly related to a lower likelihood of<br />

reincarceration, rearrest, and drug relapse.<br />

Recommendation:<br />

1. Correctional officials, in cooperation with Parole, Probation and privately contracted<br />

Community Correctional Facilities (CCF’s) should mher explore and evaluate strategies<br />

to enhance post-release employment prospects.<br />

Inmate Characteristics<br />

Results indicated the necessity for researchers to account for multiple admissions into drug<br />

treatment programs. During the study period, 2,891 inmates entered our sample, but they<br />

0<br />

accounted for over 4500 admissions into various programs. Two major consequences follow.<br />

First, an inmate’s total treatment exposure (duration and intensity) varies depending upon which<br />

specific combination of treatments the inmate enters and completes. Time in treatment and<br />

treatment exposure are among the most consistent predictors of drug relapse and recidivism<br />

(Lipton, 1997). Second, previous TC studies have often not accounted for these multiple program<br />

exposures; the perplexing result is that treatment migration seems likely and previously reported<br />

findings become questionable.<br />

Treatment migration refers to problems in the delivery of treatment that result in biased<br />

comparison groups. The wrong treatment is delivered to one or more groups, or different<br />

treatment conditions are mixed. This sort of problem is surprisingly common and fiequently<br />

unaddressed in evaluation studies, even those that attempt to use random assignment (Gartin,<br />

1995). For example, Inciardi (1997:266) states: “Many of the so-called no treatment comparison<br />

133<br />

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />

been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />

and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!