0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
0 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nearly two-thirds of inmates released (65%) were released via parole; this type of release<br />
was especially likely for TC inmates (Table 15). An additional one-fifth (21%) ofthe sample was<br />
reparoled (i.e., after serving time for a previous parole violation). Only 12% served their full<br />
sentence. A small portion of others (2%) was released via other mechanisms. Four inmates died<br />
while in custody. As a result, we were able to obtain 1,071 valid cases (230 + 701 + 133 + 7) for<br />
analyses at this time. Of these, 247 inmates (23%) were in the experimental (TC) group, with<br />
potentially an additional 28 cases to be added fkom the Alumni group. The comparison group<br />
consisted of 803 inmates fiom Education (369) and Outpatient (440) groups.<br />
We first present results for reincarceration, then rearrest, and then drug relapse. Sample<br />
sizes varied depending upon the number of missing cases in each agency data run, as well as the<br />
date of the data run (which influenced the total amount of time that an inmate has been at risk<br />
0<br />
since his release).<br />
94<br />
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>. This report has not<br />
been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)<br />
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.
Change language