10.05.2014 Views

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cite as In re Genna, 19 DB Rptr 109 (2005)<br />

care, custody, and control of the parties’ minor child; modifying the parenting plan<br />

to allow Brandalee Tidwell, then known as Brandalee Diodonet (hereinafter<br />

“Diodonet”) only supervised contact with the child for up to three hours per week;<br />

requiring Diodonet to pay child support in an amount to be determined under the<br />

<strong>Oregon</strong> Child Support Guidelines; and requiring Diodonet to pay Roger Tidwell his<br />

costs and attorney fees.<br />

7.<br />

On or about March 5, 2003, the court entered an order requiring Diodonet to<br />

appear and show cause why the Decree should not be modified to grant the relief<br />

requested by Roger Tidwell. Diodonet was personally served with a copy of the<br />

court’s order on March 5, 2003, but thereafter failed to file an appearance or notify<br />

Roger Tidwell’s counsel that she intended to do so.<br />

8.<br />

On or about April 5, 2003, Roger Tidwell’s counsel filed a Motion for Entry<br />

of Default, Motion for Entry of Judgment, and proposed form of Judgment<br />

Modifying Custody and Parenting Plan. On April 16, 2003, the court granted Roger<br />

Tidwell’s motions and entered an Order of Default and Judgment Modifying Custody<br />

and Parenting Plan against Diodonet.<br />

9.<br />

On or about April 24, 2003, the Accused, on behalf of Diodonet, filed a<br />

Motion to Set Aside Order of Default and Judgment. Prior to filing the motion, the<br />

Accused contacted Roger Tidwell’s counsel who informed the Accused that he was<br />

not willing to set aside the order of default and judgment. Under UTCR 5.020, Roger<br />

Tidwell was allowed until May 12, 2003, to file a response to Diodonet’s motion. On<br />

April 29, 2003, the court granted Diodonet’s Motion to Set Aside Order of Default<br />

and Judgment Modifying Custody and Parenting Plan.<br />

10.<br />

On May 12, 2003, Roger Tidwell’s counsel filed a Motion to Reconsider the<br />

court’s April 29, 2003, order setting aside the Order of Default and Judgment<br />

Modifying Custody and Parenting Plan. On June 4, 2003, the court granted Roger<br />

Tidwell’s Motion to Reconsider and denied Diodonet’s Motion to Set Aside Order<br />

of Default and Judgment Modifying Custody and Parenting Plan, except on the issue<br />

of attorney fees, with that issue to be set for hearing on June 30, 2003. The hearing<br />

was rescheduled to July 28, 2003.<br />

11.<br />

On July 22, 2003, the court clerk’s office issued a notice of scheduled court<br />

proceeding, which scheduled a trial date in the Court Action for October 29, 2003.<br />

A copy of the notice was served on the Accused and Roger Tidwell’s counsel.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!