10.05.2014 Views

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cite as In re Koblegarde, 19 DB Rptr 22 (2005)<br />

STIPULATION FOR DISCIPLINE<br />

B. Rupert Koblegarde, attorney at law (hereinafter “the Accused”), and the<br />

<strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> (hereinafter “the <strong>Bar</strong>”) hereby stipulate to the following matters<br />

pursuant to <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Rule of Procedure 3.6(c).<br />

1.<br />

The <strong>Bar</strong> was created and exists by virtue of the laws of the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Oregon</strong><br />

and is, and at all times mentioned herein was, authorized to carry out the provisions<br />

of ORS Chapter 9, relating to the discipline of lawyers.<br />

2.<br />

The Accused was admitted by the <strong>Oregon</strong> Supreme Court to the practice of<br />

law in <strong>Oregon</strong> on September 18, 1970, and has been a member of the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Bar</strong> continuously since that time, having his office and place of business in<br />

Multnomah County, <strong>Oregon</strong>.<br />

3.<br />

The Accused enters into this Stipulation for Discipline freely and voluntarily.<br />

This Stipulation for Discipline is made under the restrictions of <strong>Bar</strong> Rule of<br />

Procedure 3.6(h).<br />

4.<br />

On December 1, 2004, an Amended Formal Complaint was filed against the<br />

Accused pursuant to the authorization of the <strong>State</strong> Professional Responsibility <strong>Board</strong><br />

(hereinafter “SPRB”), alleging violation of DR 5-105(E) and DR 6-101(A). The<br />

parties intend that this Stipulation for Discipline set forth all relevant facts, violations,<br />

and the agreed-upon sanction as a final disposition of the proceeding.<br />

Facts<br />

5.<br />

In July 1999, the Accused was retained by Bernice Greening (hereinafter<br />

“Greening”) to represent her in an estate planning matter. On September 3, 1999,<br />

Greening executed a revocable living trust, a power of attorney, a pour-over will and<br />

a warranty deed prepared by the Accused. After September 3, 1999, the Accused<br />

continued to represent Greening in the estate planning matter.<br />

6.<br />

On or about September 3, 1999, the Accused undertook to represent Sharon<br />

Ketchum (hereinafter “Ketchum”), Greening’s daughter, in a proceeding to appoint<br />

Ketchum as guardian and another person as conservator for Greening. On Ketchum’s<br />

behalf, the Accused prepared and filed a petition and affidavit in support of the<br />

appointment of a guardian and conservatorship for Greening.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!