10.05.2014 Views

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cite as In re Trukositz, 19 DB Rptr 78 (2005)<br />

of his professional judgment on behalf of his client would be or reasonably might be<br />

affected by his own financial business, property, or personal interest without<br />

obtaining Mejia’s consent after full disclosure. After disclosing to Mejia that her<br />

claim was barred by the statute of limitations, the Accused represented to her that he<br />

would notify his insurance company; he would give his insurance company Mejia’s<br />

name, address, and telephone number; and his insurance company would contact her<br />

and pay her damages. The Accused admitted also that between about March 1999<br />

and December 22, 2000, the Accused (a) did not investigate Mejia’s claim; (b) did<br />

not contact the adverse party or the adverse party’s insurance carrier concerning<br />

Mejia’s claim; (c) did not file a lawsuit concerning Mejia’s claim; (d) did not monitor<br />

the statute of limitations as it concerned Meija’s claim; (e) did not request and obtain<br />

an agreement to toll the statute of limitations; and (f) did not take other action to<br />

protect, prepare, prosecute, or resolve Mejia’s claim.<br />

A hearing was scheduled for August 25, 2003; however, due to an accident<br />

which severely injured one of the Trial Panel, the hearing was postponed. The<br />

hearing was ultimately held on March 15, 2004, in Pendleton, <strong>Oregon</strong>. Trial Panel<br />

members included Mitchell P. Rogers, Carol DeHaven Skerjanec, and the<br />

undersigned, Carl W. Hopp, Jr. The <strong>Bar</strong> was represented by Jane E. Angus, and the<br />

Accused was represented by Jonel Ricker. The witnesses called by the Accused<br />

included John Smallmon, Norma Rolland, Toni Emerson, and the Accused. The only<br />

witness for the <strong>Bar</strong> was Mirna Mejia. The <strong>Bar</strong> offered Exhibits 1 through 12 and all<br />

were received. There were no prehearing rulings that affected the disposition of the<br />

case.<br />

Finding of Fact<br />

1. The following facts were proved to the Trial Panel by clear and<br />

convincing evidence;<br />

(A) The <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> was created and exists by virtue of the laws of<br />

the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Oregon</strong> and is, and at all times mentioned herein was, authorized to carry<br />

out the provisions of ORS Chapter 9, relating to the discipline of attorneys.<br />

(B) The Accused, Stephen Trukositz, is, and at all times mentioned herein<br />

was, an attorney at law, duly admitted by the Supreme Court of the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Oregon</strong><br />

to practice law in this state and a member of the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong>, having his office<br />

and place of business in the Umatilla County, <strong>Oregon</strong>.<br />

(C) On or about December 22,1998, Mirna L. Mejia (hereinafter “Mejia”)<br />

was injured in a motor vehicle accident. On or about March 11, 1999, Mejia retained<br />

the Accused to pursue her personal injury claim.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!