10.05.2014 Views

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cite as In re White, 19 DB Rptr 343 (2005)<br />

STIPULATION FOR DISCIPLINE<br />

James Eduard White, attorney at law (hereinafter “the Accused”), and the<br />

<strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> (hereinafter “the <strong>Bar</strong>”) hereby stipulate to the following matters<br />

pursuant to <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Rule of Procedure 3.6(c).<br />

1.<br />

The <strong>Bar</strong> was created and exists by virtue of the laws of the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Oregon</strong><br />

and is, and at all times mentioned herein was, authorized to carry out the provisions<br />

of ORS Chapter 9, relating to the discipline of lawyers.<br />

2.<br />

The Accused was admitted by the <strong>Oregon</strong> Supreme Court to the practice of<br />

law in <strong>Oregon</strong> on April 26, 1991, and has been a member of the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong><br />

continuously since that time, having his office and place of business in Yamhill<br />

County, <strong>Oregon</strong>.<br />

3.<br />

The Accused enters into this Stipulation for Discipline freely and voluntarily.<br />

This Stipulation for Discipline is made under the restrictions of <strong>Bar</strong> Rule of<br />

Procedure 3.6(h).<br />

4.<br />

On December 10, 2004, a Formal Complaint was filed against the Accused<br />

pursuant to the authorization of the <strong>State</strong> Professional Responsibility <strong>Board</strong><br />

(hereinafter “SPRB”), alleging violations of DR 3-102(A) and DR 6-101(A) of the<br />

Code of Professional Responsibility in Case No. 04-124. On May 24, 2005, an<br />

Amended Formal Complaint was filed against the Accused pursuant to the<br />

authorization of the SPRB, alleging violation of an additional disciplinary rule, DR<br />

3-101(A), in Case No. 05-56. The parties intend that this Stipulation for Discipline<br />

set forth all relevant facts, violations, and the agreed-upon sanction as a final<br />

disposition of the proceeding.<br />

Facts<br />

5.<br />

At all relevant times, Florentino Aleman (hereinafter “Aleman”) was the<br />

proprietor of Aleman’s Interpreter Translator Service. In addition to performing<br />

interpretation and translation services for Spanish-speaking clients, Aleman also<br />

assisted and advised clients in immigration matters and prepared documents for<br />

submission to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (hereinafter “INS”).<br />

Aleman was not an active member of the <strong>Oregon</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong>.<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!