P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

Cite as In re Genna, 19 DB Rptr 109 (2005)
Although reprimand may be considered, the circumstances of this case are
more aggravated and therefore a period of suspension is the appropriate sanction.
See, e.g., In re Roberts, 335 Or 476, 71 P3d 71 (2003); In re Thompson, 325 Or 467,
940 P2d 512 (1997); and In re Smith, 316 Or 55, 848 P2d 612 (1993), where the
court imposed short-term suspensions for violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and other
rules.
20.
Consistent with the Standards and Oregon case law, the Bar and the Accused
agree that the Accused shall be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days for
violation of DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 7-110(B)(2), and DR 7-110(B)(3), the suspension
effective May 1, 2005, or three days after the date the stipulation is approved,
whichever is later.
21.
This Stipulation for Discipline has been reviewed by the Disciplinary Counsel
of the Oregon State Bar, the sanction was approved by the State Professional
Responsibility Board, and shall be submitted to the Disciplinary Board for
consideration under the terms of BR 3.6.
DATED this 15th day of April 2005.
/s/ Michael R. Genna
Michael R. Genna
OSB No. 72087
OREGON STATE BAR
By: /s/ Jane E. Angus
Jane E. Angus
OSB No. 73014
Assistant Disciplinary Counsel
115