P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

Cite as In re Jackson, 19 DB Rptr 233 (2005)
further similar acts of misconduct that cause injury or potential injury to a client, the
public, the legal system, or the profession. Standards, § 8.2.
15.
Oregon case law is in accord. See, e.g., In re Labahn, 335 Or 357, 67 P3d 381
(2003) (60 days’ suspension for violation of DR 6-101(B) when lawyer had
previously been admonished for similar misconduct); In re Wetteland, 12 DB Rptr
246 (1998) (60 days’ suspension for violation of DR 6-101(B), DR 9-101(A), DR
9-101(C)(3), and DR 9-101(C)(4), when lawyer had previously been admonished for
violation of DR 6-101(B)). See also In re Eakin, 334 Or 238, 48 P3d 147 (2002) (60
days’ suspension for violation of DR 9-101(A), DR 9-101(C)(3), and DR 9-101(C)(4)
(lawyer had no prior record but had substantial experience in practice of law)).
16.
Consistent with the Standards and Oregon case law, the Bar and the Accused
agree that the Accused shall be suspended for 60 days for violation of DR
2-110(A)(2), DR 6-101(B), DR 9-101(C)(3), and DR 9-101(C)(4) of the Code of
Professional Responsibility, the suspension to be effective August 25, 2005, or three
days after this stipulation is approved, whichever is later.
17.
This Stipulation for Discipline has been reviewed by the Disciplinary Counsel
of the Oregon State Bar, the sanction was approved by the State Professional
Responsibility Board, and shall be submitted to the Disciplinary Board for
consideration under the terms of BR 3.6.
DATED this 20th day of July 2005.
/s/ Neil W. Jackson
Neil W. Jackson
OSB No. 78256
OREGON STATE BAR
By: /s/ Jane E. Angus
Jane E. Angus
OSB No. 73014
Assistant Disciplinary Counsel
238