P:\CLEPUB\Books\Disciplinary Board Reporter ... - Oregon State Bar

Cite as In re Lebenbaum, 19 DB Rptr 154 (2005)
Oregon case law is in accord. See, e.g., In re Koch, 18 DB Rptr 92 (2004)
(reprimand for violation of DR 2-110(A) and (B), DR 6-101(B), and DR
9-101(C)(4)); In re Russell, 18 DB Rptr 98 (2004) (reprimand for violation of DR
6-101(B)); In re Cohen, 330 Or 489, 8 P3d 953 (2000) (reprimand for violation of
DR 6-101(B) when lawyer had prior record of neglect, and significant mitigating
factors present).
11.
Consistent with the Standards and Oregon case law, the Bar and the Accused
agree that the Accused shall be publicly reprimanded for violation of DR 6-101(B)
of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
12.
This Stipulation for Discipline has been reviewed by the Disciplinary Counsel
of the Oregon State Bar, the sanction was approved by the State Professional
Responsibility Board, and shall be submitted to the Disciplinary Board for
consideration under the terms of BR 3.6.
DATED this 20th day of May 2005.
/s/ Philip Lebenbaum
Philip Lebenbaum
OSB No. 86062
OREGON STATE BAR
By: /s/ Jane E. Angus
Jane E. Angus
OSB No. 73014
Assistant Disciplinary Counsel
158