09.06.2014 Views

RenewableS 2013 GlObal STaTUS RePORT - REN21

RenewableS 2013 GlObal STaTUS RePORT - REN21

RenewableS 2013 GlObal STaTUS RePORT - REN21

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRENDS BY TECHNOLOGY – Characteristics and Costs<br />

99<br />

Table 2 (continued)<br />

USD 0.05/kWh, from IRENA, op. cit. this note, p. 46. Investment<br />

costs for hydropower projects can be as low as USD 400–500/kW,<br />

but most realistic projects today are in the range of USD<br />

1,000–3,000 per kW, per Edenhofer et al., op. cit. this note, p.<br />

1006. Off-grid capital costs and LCOE from <strong>REN21</strong>, Renewables<br />

2011 Global Status Report (Paris: 2011). Note that the cost for<br />

hydropower plants is site-specific and may have large variations.<br />

Small capacity plants in some areas even may exceed these limits.<br />

The cost is dependent on several factors especially plant load<br />

factor, discount rate, and life of the project. Normally, small-scale<br />

hydro projects last 20–50 years compared to large-scale hydro<br />

plants, which may last 30–80 years. Hydro facilities that are<br />

designed to be load-following (rather than baseload) have lower<br />

capacity factors and therefore higher generation costs per kWh,<br />

on average.<br />

Ocean Energy: All data are from Edenhofer et al., op. cit. this note.<br />

Note that this is based on a very small number of installations to<br />

date; LCOE range assumes a 7% discount rate. Electricity<br />

generation costs are in the range of USD 0.31–0.39/kWh (EUR<br />

0.24–0.30/kWh), from Sarasin, Working Towards a Cleaner and<br />

Smarter Power Supply: Prospects for Renewables in the Energy<br />

Revolution (Basel, Switzerland: December 2012), p. 11.<br />

Solar PV: Rooftop solar systems: peak capacities are based on<br />

Europe and drawn from European Photovoltaic Industry<br />

Association (EPIA), Market Report 2011 (Brussels: January 2012),<br />

and from EPIA, personal communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, 3 April<br />

2012. Capacity factor from IRENA, op. cit. this note, p. 56. Note<br />

that values outside of this range are possible for exceptional sites<br />

(higher) or where siting is suboptimal (lower); adding tracking<br />

systems can raise these capacity factors significantly, from<br />

IRENA, idem. Capital costs based on: average of EUR 1,750/kW<br />

(using exchange rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.3) for residential systems<br />

up to 10 kWp, in fourth quarter of 2012, from German Solar<br />

Industry Association (BSW-Solar), “Statistic Data on the German<br />

Solar Power (Photovoltaic) Industry,” February <strong>2013</strong>, at www.<br />

solarwirtschaft.de; U.S. range of 4,300–5,000 by end of 2012,<br />

with low end being average cost for non-residential systems (USD<br />

5.04/W) and high end being average cost for residential systems<br />

(USD 4.27/W), from U.S. Solar Energy Industries Association<br />

(SEIA) and GTM Research, “U.S. Solar Market Grows 76% in 2012;<br />

Now an Increasingly Competitive Energy Source for Millions of<br />

Americans Today,” press release (Washington, DC and Boston,<br />

MA: 14 March <strong>2013</strong>); Japan based on average of about 437,000<br />

JPY/kW for systems of 10–50 kW, and about 375,000 JPY/kW<br />

(converted using JPY 1 = USD 0.099) for systems of 50–500 kW,<br />

from Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI),<br />

“Procurement Prices Calculation Committee,” www.meti.go.jp/<br />

committee/gizi_0000015.html (in Japanese); typical global range<br />

for industrial systems based on EUR 1,150–2,000/kW (converted<br />

using EUR 1 = USD 1.3), from Gaëtan Masson, EPIA and IEA<br />

Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (IEA-PVPS), personal<br />

communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, April <strong>2013</strong>. Note that costs were<br />

down significantly from the second quarter of 2012, when capital<br />

costs in Germany for fixed-tilt rooftop systems averaged USD<br />

2,200/kW, and in the United States average prices for residential<br />

systems were USD 5,500/kW, with a range of USD 4,000–8,000,<br />

per IRENA, op. cit. this note, pp. 7, 54, 55. Note that the IEA puts<br />

capital costs for small-scale systems in the range of USD<br />

2,400–6,000/kW, per IEA, Tracking Clean Energy Progress <strong>2013</strong><br />

(Paris: OECD/IEA, <strong>2013</strong>), p. 30. LCOE costs for OECD and<br />

non-OECD are 2012 USD, from lowest to highest, and based on<br />

7% cost of capital, from IRENA, op. cit. this note, from IRENA<br />

Renewable Cost Database, <strong>2013</strong>, and from Michael Taylor, IRENA,<br />

personal communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, May <strong>2013</strong>; Europe based on<br />

costs in the range of EUR 0.12–0.29/kWh (converted using EUR 1<br />

= USD 1.3) for residential, commercial, and industrial projects in<br />

the south and north of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the<br />

United Kingdom, from EPIA database, provided by Masson, op.<br />

cit. this note. Ground-mounted utility-scale systems: peak capacity<br />

from EPIA, Market Report 2011, op. cit. this note, from David<br />

Renne, International Solar Energy Society (ISES), personal<br />

communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, April <strong>2013</strong>, and from Denis Lenardic,<br />

pvresources.com, personal communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, April<br />

<strong>2013</strong>; also see relevant section and endnotes in Market and<br />

Industry Trends by Technology. Conversion efficiency low of 10% is<br />

for amorphous silicon and high of 30% is for concentrating PV,<br />

from Gaetan Masson, EPIA and IEA-PVPS, personal communication<br />

with <strong>REN21</strong>, 21 March <strong>2013</strong>. Note that conversion efficiency<br />

for ground-mounted utility-scale was noted as 15–27% in EPIA,<br />

Market Report 2011, op. cit. this note. Capital costs based on the<br />

following: typical global costs based on 1,000–1,500 Euros/kW<br />

(converted using EUR 1 = USD 1.3) from Masson, April <strong>2013</strong>, op.<br />

cit. this note; USD 2,270/kW was the weighted average in the<br />

United States at the end of 2012, from SEIA and GTM Research,<br />

op. cit. this note; Japan based on average capital cost of 280,000<br />

JPY/kW (converted using JPY 1 = USD 0.099) for systems over 1<br />

MW, from Japanese METI, op. cit. this note; and China (USD<br />

2,200/kW) and India (USD 1,700/kW) from IRENA, op. cit. this<br />

note, pp. 54–55. Note that the U.S. range in the second quarter of<br />

2012 was USD 2,000–3,600, with a capacity weighted average of<br />

USD 2,900/kW, from IRENA, op. cit. this note. Also note that the<br />

IEA puts capital costs for large-scale systems in the range of USD<br />

1,300–3,500/kW, from IEA, Tracking Clean Energy…, op. cit. this<br />

note, p. 30. LCOE based on the following: OECD and non-OECD<br />

cost ranges are 2012 USD, with 7% discount rate, from IRENA,<br />

Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2012…, op. cit. this note,<br />

from IRENA Renewable Cost Database, <strong>2013</strong>, and from Michael<br />

Taylor, IRENA, personal communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, May <strong>2013</strong>;<br />

Europe based on LCOE in the range of EUR 0.11–0.26/kWh (using<br />

exchange rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.3) for ground-mounted systems<br />

in the south and north of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the<br />

United Kingdom, from EPIA database, provided by Masson, op.<br />

cit. this note. Note that the LCOE in Thailand is estimated to be in<br />

the range of USD 0.15–0.18/kWh, based on input from project<br />

developers and former Thai Minister of Energy Piyasvasti<br />

Amranand, per Chris Greacen, Palang Thai, personal communication<br />

with <strong>REN21</strong>, April <strong>2013</strong>. While PV module prices are global,<br />

balance of system costs are much more local. Also, note that<br />

prices have been changing rapidly.<br />

CSP: Characteristics including plant sizes from European Solar<br />

Thermal Electricity Association (ESTELA), personal communication<br />

with <strong>REN21</strong>, 22 March 2012 and 24 January <strong>2013</strong>; from<br />

Protermosolar, the Spanish Solar Thermal Electricity Industry<br />

Association, April 2012; and based on parabolic trough plants that<br />

are typically in the range of 50–200 MW; tower 20–70 MW; and<br />

Linear Fresnel in the range of 1–50 MW, per Bank Sarasin, Solar<br />

Industry: Survival of the Fittest in the Fiercely Competitive<br />

Marketplace (Basel, Switzerland: November 2011). Note that<br />

multiple systems can be combined for higher-capacity plants.<br />

Capacity factors based on ESTELA, op. cit. this note, and on<br />

Michael Mendelsohn, Travis Lowder, and Brendan Canavan,<br />

Utility-Scale Concentrating Solar Power and Photovoltaics Projects:<br />

A Technology and Market Overview (Golden, CO: U.S. National<br />

Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), April 2012); on 20–28%<br />

capacity factor for plants without storage and 40–50% for plants<br />

with 6–7.5 hours storage, from U.S. Department of Energy,<br />

SunShot Vision Study, prepared by NREL (Golden, CO: February<br />

2012), p. 105; on 20–30% for parabolic trough plants without<br />

storage and 40% to as high as 80% for tower plants with 6–15<br />

hours of storage, from IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs<br />

in 2012…, op. cit. this note, p. 19; and on the capacity factor of<br />

parabolic trough plants with six hours of storage, in conditions<br />

typical of the U.S. Southwest estimated to be 35–42%, per<br />

Edenhofer et al., op. cit. this note, pp. 1004, 1006. Note that the<br />

Gemasolar plant, which began operation in Spain in 2011, has<br />

storage for up to 15 hours, per Torresol Energy, “Gemasol,” www.<br />

torresolenergy.com/TORRESOL/gemasolar-plant/en. Capital costs<br />

based on: U.S. parabolic trough and tower plants without storage<br />

in the range of USD 4,000–6,000/kW, and trough and towers with<br />

storage in the range of USD 7,000–10,000/kW, from U.S.<br />

Department of Energy, Loans Programs Office, www.lgprogram.<br />

energy.gov, provided by Fred Morse, Abengoa Solar, personal<br />

communication with <strong>REN21</strong>, April <strong>2013</strong>; and on parabolic trough<br />

plants with storage capital costs of USD 4,700–7,300/kW in OECD<br />

countries, and 3,100–4,050/kW in non-OECD (based on costs of<br />

five projects), and costs with storage all from IRENA, Renewable<br />

Power Generation Costs in 2012…, op. cit. this note, pp. 19,<br />

59–60; and on range of about 3,900–8,000/kW from IEA,<br />

Tracking Clean Energy…, op. cit. this note. LCOE estimates in table<br />

all assume a 10% cost of capital and come from IRENA,<br />

Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2012…, op. cit. this note, p.<br />

65. Other LCOE estimates include: range of USD 0.12–0.16/kWh<br />

from GTM Research, Concentrating Solar Power 2011: Technology,<br />

Costs and Markets (Boston: 15 February 2011); range of USD<br />

0.19–0.29/kWh (assuming a 7% discount rate) from Edenhofer et<br />

al., op. cit. this note, p. 1004, assuming 7% discount rate; and<br />

EUR 0.15–0.20/kWh per ESTELA, The Essential Role for Solar<br />

Thermal Electricity (Brussels: October 2012), p. 3.<br />

Wind power: Characteristics based on the following: turbine sizes<br />

from JRC, 2011 Technology Map…, op. cit. this note; on- and<br />

offshore capacity factors from Edenhofer et al., op. cit. this note,<br />

p. 1005; and from IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in<br />

2012…, op. cit. this note, p. 36. Note that weighted average<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!