27.07.2014 Views

Report - London Borough of Hillingdon

Report - London Borough of Hillingdon

Report - London Borough of Hillingdon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hillingdon</strong> Performance Management │ 13<br />

increased to 67% and 81% respectively I which placed the Council in the second<br />

best performance quartile for both <strong>of</strong> these indicators. A range <strong>of</strong> interventions<br />

have been introduced to deliver improvements in processes which had previously<br />

impeded performance. Whilst it is not possible to quantify which <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

procedural changes has had the most impact the cumulative result has been to<br />

raise performance in all three indicators to above the national targets (based on<br />

provisional figures) II . Improved process times can be achieved to the detriment <strong>of</strong><br />

quality. BVPI 205 introduced in 2004/05 gives a score derived from an<br />

assessment made against a "Quality <strong>of</strong> Service Checklist." Similarly, the new<br />

indicator on the percentage <strong>of</strong> appeals allowed against the authority's decision to<br />

refuse a planning application can be used as a proxy indicator <strong>of</strong> quality. Both<br />

these new indicators need to be reviewed to ensure that the progress being<br />

achieved in terms <strong>of</strong> the timeliness by which applications are determined does<br />

not negatively impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> the service provided.<br />

50 The range <strong>of</strong> interventions included;<br />

• More frequent Planning Committee meetings and prioritising work to match<br />

committee schedules;<br />

• Case load monitoring and review meetings, with;<br />

- use <strong>of</strong> technology to identify problems at an early stage;<br />

- Officers held to account for failures in meeting targets;<br />

- thorough and close management <strong>of</strong> major applications;<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> digital cameras to reduce the need for on site visits;<br />

• The introduction <strong>of</strong> a manual for guidance, use <strong>of</strong> pro formas and shorter,<br />

simpler reports;<br />

• The rigorous application <strong>of</strong> delegation agreements; and<br />

• Weekly briefings to the Portfolio Lead Member.<br />

51 In addition to sustaining performance against national standards the revised<br />

processes have also enabled the backlog <strong>of</strong> applications to be substantially<br />

reduced.<br />

Housing Benefits<br />

52 Performance in terms <strong>of</strong> the timeliness by which new benefits claims and<br />

notifications <strong>of</strong> changes in circumstances are processed is measured by BVPI<br />

78a-b. The Council's performance remains below government targets, and puts<br />

the Council in the bottom quartile <strong>of</strong> performance. The Council's performance in<br />

quarter 4 2004/05 showed an improvement. III Speed <strong>of</strong> processing improvements<br />

must be achieved alongside improvements in terms <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the service<br />

provided. One measure <strong>of</strong> quality is the percentage <strong>of</strong> cases for which the<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

The most recent performance indicators for Planning and other services discussed in this report are still<br />

provisional.<br />

Source - Management Board Performance <strong>Report</strong> Quarter 4<br />

Source - Management Board Performance <strong>Report</strong> Quarter 4<br />

<strong>London</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hillingdon</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!