Report - London Borough of Hillingdon
Report - London Borough of Hillingdon
Report - London Borough of Hillingdon
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Hillingdon</strong> Performance Management │ 13<br />
increased to 67% and 81% respectively I which placed the Council in the second<br />
best performance quartile for both <strong>of</strong> these indicators. A range <strong>of</strong> interventions<br />
have been introduced to deliver improvements in processes which had previously<br />
impeded performance. Whilst it is not possible to quantify which <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
procedural changes has had the most impact the cumulative result has been to<br />
raise performance in all three indicators to above the national targets (based on<br />
provisional figures) II . Improved process times can be achieved to the detriment <strong>of</strong><br />
quality. BVPI 205 introduced in 2004/05 gives a score derived from an<br />
assessment made against a "Quality <strong>of</strong> Service Checklist." Similarly, the new<br />
indicator on the percentage <strong>of</strong> appeals allowed against the authority's decision to<br />
refuse a planning application can be used as a proxy indicator <strong>of</strong> quality. Both<br />
these new indicators need to be reviewed to ensure that the progress being<br />
achieved in terms <strong>of</strong> the timeliness by which applications are determined does<br />
not negatively impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> the service provided.<br />
50 The range <strong>of</strong> interventions included;<br />
• More frequent Planning Committee meetings and prioritising work to match<br />
committee schedules;<br />
• Case load monitoring and review meetings, with;<br />
- use <strong>of</strong> technology to identify problems at an early stage;<br />
- Officers held to account for failures in meeting targets;<br />
- thorough and close management <strong>of</strong> major applications;<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> digital cameras to reduce the need for on site visits;<br />
• The introduction <strong>of</strong> a manual for guidance, use <strong>of</strong> pro formas and shorter,<br />
simpler reports;<br />
• The rigorous application <strong>of</strong> delegation agreements; and<br />
• Weekly briefings to the Portfolio Lead Member.<br />
51 In addition to sustaining performance against national standards the revised<br />
processes have also enabled the backlog <strong>of</strong> applications to be substantially<br />
reduced.<br />
Housing Benefits<br />
52 Performance in terms <strong>of</strong> the timeliness by which new benefits claims and<br />
notifications <strong>of</strong> changes in circumstances are processed is measured by BVPI<br />
78a-b. The Council's performance remains below government targets, and puts<br />
the Council in the bottom quartile <strong>of</strong> performance. The Council's performance in<br />
quarter 4 2004/05 showed an improvement. III Speed <strong>of</strong> processing improvements<br />
must be achieved alongside improvements in terms <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the service<br />
provided. One measure <strong>of</strong> quality is the percentage <strong>of</strong> cases for which the<br />
I<br />
II<br />
III<br />
The most recent performance indicators for Planning and other services discussed in this report are still<br />
provisional.<br />
Source - Management Board Performance <strong>Report</strong> Quarter 4<br />
Source - Management Board Performance <strong>Report</strong> Quarter 4<br />
<strong>London</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hillingdon</strong>