29.08.2014 Views

Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Memorandum<br />

March 1, 2010<br />

Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

Legend:<br />

Limited Access Area*<br />

Open Pier Area<br />

Figure: Pier Demolition/Construction Scenarios<br />

*The area shown as Limited Access is only valid when the ‘inverted pyramid’ building is to remain in<br />

place. If the ‘inverted pyramid’ building is removed, the entire pier is considered open.<br />

Demolition Costs:<br />

Demolition for the open pier condition was developed by calculating quantities based on the existing<br />

pier drawings. The cost estimate considers demolition <strong>of</strong> concrete beams, deck and piles. Costs were<br />

based on cubic yards <strong>of</strong> concrete removed and disposed <strong>of</strong> locally.<br />

If the <strong>City</strong> decides to keep the existing ‘inverted pyramid’ building, then selective demolition will be<br />

required to remove the 1920s deck and beams in a limited access condition. As previously mentioned,<br />

limited access construction will be less efficient and more expensive. The unit costs developed assume<br />

all interior building demolition required to access the deck has been completed. As cranes will have<br />

limited ability in this area, demolition <strong>of</strong> the deck and beams will have to be completed with less<br />

efficient equipment. The costs to demolish, remove and locally dispose <strong>of</strong> the concrete beams, piles<br />

and deck have been included. Typically, new piles would be driven to support a new deck and beams;<br />

however, piles cannot be driven in this area because <strong>of</strong> the limited mobility <strong>of</strong> cranes and lack <strong>of</strong><br />

overhead clearance for driving. For this reason, the existing piles will remain and must be repaired for<br />

reuse if the existing ‘inverted pyramid’ building is kept. Therefore, the limited access cost estimate<br />

assumes that no piles under the ‘inverted pyramid’ building are removed.<br />

If the <strong>City</strong> decides to replace the building, the approach to removal <strong>of</strong> the building foundations<br />

assumed the following steps per foundation:<br />

1. Cutting <strong>of</strong> the steel sheet pile vertically in two locations in each caisson face<br />

2. Drilling five holes in the concrete to allow saw cutting <strong>of</strong> an expansion release<br />

3. Drilling a pattern <strong>of</strong> holes for the insertion <strong>of</strong> expansive grout to crack the mass concrete<br />

4. Excavation <strong>of</strong> the concrete from within the caisson<br />

5. Extraction <strong>of</strong> the steel sheet and main load-bearing piles<br />

6. Disposal <strong>of</strong> all materials

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!