Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Pier Competition | Page 9 Relevant Project Examples: The Team shall identify comparable and relevant project examples of major waterfront or iconic structures in urban settings similar to the vision for this project. Examples must be limited to projects completed within the past ten (10) years. The experience of the Team relative to similar projects shall include a description of the project objectives, the resulting solution and the significant or key attributes that made the project a successful landmark. The SOQ must indicate how previous project examples are relevant to this project. In addition, the previous project descriptions should include the following: Client Name and description of the project. Comparison of project budget and final costs to the client. Comparison of the original and actual project schedule. The client's contact person and telephone number. Team Background and Experience: This section shall include the background and history of each of the members of the Team along with their experience and credentials. The methods by which each of the individual team members will participate in the process shall be stated. A detailed resume of the Team’s lead designer shall be provided. The proposed key lead designer and the proposed substitute shall have a minimum of ten (10) years of applicable experience and shall remain with the project throughout the term of the A/E Agreement with the City. The qualifications, experience, awards and design recognition, other competitions entered and won and the education of the lead designer and any other pertinent team members shall be submitted. The lead designer shall not be replaced or substituted without the prior approval of the City. Experience included on the resume must be limited to projects completed within the past ten (10) years. In addition the following information must be provided: One (1) updated Standard Form 254 or Standard Form 330, for each member of the Team. Professional Licenses. Copy of each member of the Team’s current applicable professional license. Identify Florida specific licenses as requested. References. A list of three (3) client contact persons for whom the lead designer has recently provided services similar in nature to this project.
Pier Competition | Page 10 3. Format and number of copies required: One original and eight (8) bound hard copy sets of the SOQ must be submitted. In addition, one electronic file on a CD in PDF format must also be submitted. 4. Submission and compliance check: City staff will receive the SOQ packages, perform an initial review of completeness and forward to the Jury for their review. 5. The Jury will evaluate the SOQs and develop a “long list” of up to ten (10) qualified Teams for further consideration. 6. City staff will review the references, and qualifications of the long list Teams and obtain any other background information requested by the Jury. Any questions or request for clarifications for the long list Teams will be issued in writing by the City at this time. Staff will provide the Jury a summary report of the findings for final evaluation. 7. The Jury will select three (3) final Teams to be invited to participate in the Design Concept Submission, subject to City Council Approval. 8. City Staff enters into Agreement with selected short list Teams for design concept and takes to City Council for approval. VIII. Stage 2: Design Concept Submission 1. A Competition mandatory briefing and site visit will be required of the three (3) Stage 2 Teams. The briefing will include a series of conversations with the public, the City Staff, and elected officials. The environmental permitting agencies will also have representatives at the briefing. In addition to discussions on the competition procedures and requirements, the agenda will include presentations on the history of the Pier, budget constraints and the programmatic opportunities. The required format for estimates of probable construction cost, the detailed environmental permitting analysis, detailed planning documents and existing geotechnical and structural reports will be provided to each of the Teams. 2. Question and Answer Period. Written questions can be submitted on any aspect of the competition by established deadline. Copies of all questions and answers will be posted to the competition website. 3. Mandatory Qualification Package contents:
Page 1:
THE NEW ST. PETERSBURG PIER BASIS O
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENT: BASIS OF DESIGN BOOK 1 1 2
Page 7:
AST. PETERSBURG PIER SITE CONDITION
Page 10 and 11:
2. Parking Lots Parking lots exhibi
Page 12 and 13:
4. Entrance Plaza The Entrance Plaz
Page 14 and 15:
Electrical: There is a series of ab
Page 16 and 17:
B. Bulkhead The bulkhead or seawall
Page 18 and 19:
C. Existing Pier The existing Pier
Page 20 and 21:
5. Navigational Access The current
Page 22 and 23:
Meeting with City Engineers 6/28 A
Page 55 and 56:
Meeting Minutes (Rev 01) project Th
Page 57:
CCONCEPTUAL FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY PR
Page 60 and 61:
6.0 RB initially expressed concern
Page 63 and 64:
idge, highway & rail engineering en
Page 65:
St. Petersburg Pier Page 3 MEG File
Page 69 and 70:
1509 W. Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tam
Page 71 and 72:
ERP Permit Application: New St. Pet
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
PART 3: A. Owner(s) of Land B. Appl
Page 81 and 82:
PART 8: A. If there have been any p
Page 83 and 84:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLI
Page 85 and 86:
5. Summarize impacts to wetlands an
Page 87 and 88:
E. Drainage Information 1. Provide
Page 89 and 90:
TABLE ONE: PROJECT WETLAND AND OTHE
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE THREE: PROJECT OFF-SITE MITIG
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE FIVE: SUMMARY OF SHORELINE ST
Page 96:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Soil Map-Pinellas County, Florida (
Page 105 and 106:
Page 120 and 121:
25 18 ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT 36
Page 122:
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT 36
Page 147 and 148:
TECHNICAL M E M O R A N D U M TO: F
Page 149 and 150:
St. Petersburg Pier - Environmental
Page 151 and 152:
St. Petersburg Pier - Environmental
Page 153 and 154:
G:\x\PROJECTS\002037_StPetePierEval
Page 155 and 156:
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT TECHNICAL ME
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163:
Page 175:
Page 213 and 214:
Underwater Feature Technical Worksh
Page 215 and 216:
6. Limestone definitely preferred f
Page 217 and 218:
Participant List Participant Peter
Page 219 and 220:
Dr. Betzer mentioned the names of s
Page 221 and 222:
Technical Interview 5 Summary of In
Page 223 and 224:
scientific community and the design
Page 225:
GHYDRODYNAMICS AND FLUSHING OF THE
Page 228 and 229:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Page 230 and 231:
LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 Location of St.
Page 232 and 233:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of St. Pe
Page 234 and 235:
loop structure. For the flushing ev
Page 236 and 237:
Figure 2-3b. Marina Construction De
Page 238 and 239:
Figure 2-4. Locations of NOAA Tide
Page 240 and 241:
3.0 MODELING APPROACH Based upon th
Page 242 and 243:
4.0 MODEL INPUTS 4.1 SIMULATION PER
Page 244 and 245:
Figure 4-2. Tampa Bay Model Grid in
Page 246 and 247:
Figure 4-4. Tampa Bay Model Grid in
Page 248 and 249:
Figure 4-5. Model Tidal forcing Fig
Page 250 and 251:
5.0 MODEL CALIBRATION 5.1 TIDES Fig
Page 252 and 253:
Available current data for the NOAA
Page 254 and 255:
6.0 EVALUATION OF FLUSHING IN MARIN
Page 256 and 257:
Figure 6-1c. Plan View Showing Flus
Page 258 and 259:
Figures 6-2a-e present time series
Page 260 and 261:
Figure 6-2e. Time Series Plot of Pe
Page 263:
HPIER ADVISORY TASK FORCE REPORT
Page 311 and 312:
Vision/Guiding Principles and Conte
Page 313 and 314:
Table of Contents (continued) SECTI
Page 315 and 316:
VISION The downtown waterfront is a
Page 317 and 318:
Guiding Principles (continued): Wa
Page 319 and 320:
Section II City Charter
Page 321 and 322:
Waterfront Park Element Downtown Ch
Page 323 and 324:
Evolution of the Current Waterfront
Page 325 and 326:
Planning Goals Five major planning
Page 327 and 328:
9. Comfort: a. Shade - Planting of
Page 329 and 330:
1988 Plan Implementation in the Wat
Page 331 and 332:
Art & Monuments Ordinance No. 2001-
Page 333 and 334:
Section V Downtown Waterfront Enter
Page 335 and 336:
Albert Whitted Airport ● ● ●
Page 337 and 338:
Al Lang Field (continued) ● ● O
Page 339 and 340:
Section VI Waterfront Transportatio
Page 341 and 342:
Traffic Access and Circulation ●
Page 343 and 344:
Bicycle Pedestrian Pathway ● ●
Page 345 and 346:
Daily Parking Demand ● ● ●
Page 347 and 348:
Downtown Waterfront Events ● ●
Page 349:
DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN IMP
Page 353 and 354:
Chuck Jablon Project Executive, Acc
Page 355 and 356:
OT Delancy Executive Support - SBE/
Page 357 and 358:
Mark McLaughlin, LEED® AP Senior P
Page 359 and 360:
Meoi Plummer Project Manager - Crow
Page 361 and 362:
Tommy Ward Superintendent/Quality C
Page 363 and 364:
Jake Krehbiel, LEED® AP Assistant
Page 365 and 366:
Walter Benoit Project Controls Pers
Page 367 and 368:
Mark Apaliski Preconstruction Perso
Page 369 and 370:
Robert Ward Local SBE/WMBE Personal
Page 371:
K ASCE 24-05: FLOOD RESISTANT DESIG
Page 374 and 375:
. Specifications are provided for p
Page 376 and 377:
See next page for description of Ca
Page 379:
L CITY PIER BUILDING FOUNDATION EVA
Page 383 and 384:
Memorandum March 1, 2010 Page 2 of
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387:
Page 391 and 392: ESTIMATE DETAIL The Lens Estimate T
Page 393 and 394: Index Description Quantity Unit Cos
Page 413: Index Description Quantity Unit Cos
Page 417: The New St. Petersburg Pier Life Cy
Page 421: The New St. Petersburg Pier Revenue
Page 425: The New St. Petersburg Pier Annual
Page 429: OST. PETERSBURG PIER REQUEST FOR QU
Page 432 and 433: Pier Competition | Page 1 STAGE 1 P
Page 434 and 435: Pier Competition | Page 3 Vision IV
Page 436 and 437: Pier Competition | Page 5 The Trans
Page 438 and 439: Pier Competition | Page 7 VI. Compe
Page 442 and 443: Pier Competition | Page 11 The foll
Page 444 and 445: Pier Competition | Page 13 Team Bac
Page 446 and 447: Pier Competition | Page 15 Exhibit
Page 448 and 449: Pier Competition | Page 17 Exhibit
Page 450 and 451: Pier Competition | Page 19 8. Debar
Page 452 and 453: Pier Competition | Page 21 Disputes
Page 454 and 455: Pier Competition | Page 23
Page 456: Pier Competition | Page 25 Exhibit
Page 460: MICHAEL MALTZAN ARCHITECTURE, INC.
show all

Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?