Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Memorandum March 1, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Pier Replacement Costs: Open pier costs were based on reinstalling the pier “in-kind” assuming precast/prestressed concrete piles, cast-in-place concrete pile caps and beams, and a cast-in-place concrete deck capable of supporting light traffic. As previously mentioned, work in the limited access area is complex due to mobility challenges in and around the ‘inverted pyramid’ building. Costs developed include the installation of new cast-in-place concrete pile caps, beams and deck and the repair of piles under the ‘inverted pyramid’ building, all in a confined construction environment. Pile encasement or jacketing is the assumed method of pile repair for this estimate. The jackets will require an underwater application with divers, boats and barges to stage the work. Two different pile jackets were evaluated. The first pile jacket is a standard Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) integral pile jacket with corrosion protection. This solution is anticipated to provide up to a 30-year design life. The following steps are anticipated for this repair: 1. Removal of concrete from the existing piles outside of the reinforcing 2. Attachment of cathodic protection anodes to the existing steel 3. Construction of a new steel reinforcement cage and attachment of anodes 4. Placement of a fiberglass jacket around the pile 5. Encasement of pile and new cage with concrete using the jacket as a form The second pile jacket repair method uses a similar jacket but does not include a cathodic protection system. This jacket is anticipated to provide up to a 15-year design life. Summary of Service Life and Costs: New marine structures are designed for a minimum 50-year design life, which can be extended with proper repair and maintenance. The City of St. Petersburg has provided this level of care for the existing pier and as a result has extended the service life to 90 years. The existing ‘inverted pyramid’ building and associated foundations are approximately 40 years old. The existing piles considered for reuse are approximately 90 years old. Reuse of these structures will require continual maintenance for the rest of their service life. Working in the limited access area will increase the new construction cost by roughly 3 times and only provide an additional 30 years of service life in lieu of the minimum 50-year service life of a new structure. Refer to the table for a summary of the probable construction costs for the pier demolition, building foundation demolition and pier replacement.
Memorandum March 1, 2010 Page 6 of 6 Table: Order of Magnitude Opinion of Probable Cost Pier Demolition Order of Magnitude Cost (per square foot) Pier Demolition – Open Pier Area (including piles) $50 Pier Demolition – Limited Access Area (not including piles) $70 Building Foundation Demolition Order of Magnitude Cost Building Foundation Demolition (x5 structures) $2,400,000 total Replacement (structure only) Order of Magnitude Cost (per square foot) Pier Replacement – Open Pier (50-year design life) $210 Pier Replacement – Limited Access Area (30-year design life) $750 Pier Replacement – Limited Access Area (15-year design life) $500 Reuse of the existing foundations, building and piles not only has a higher initial cost but will have a higher annual cost for inspection and maintenance. Underwater inspection of the jacketed piles would need to be performed on a bi-annual basis as compared to a new structure which will not require underwater inspection for approximately 10 years. All of these additional costs are not reflected in our estimate but should be considered during evaluation of the alternative pier configurations.
Page 1:
THE NEW ST. PETERSBURG PIER BASIS O
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENT: BASIS OF DESIGN BOOK 1 1 2
Page 7:
AST. PETERSBURG PIER SITE CONDITION
Page 10 and 11:
2. Parking Lots Parking lots exhibi
Page 12 and 13:
4. Entrance Plaza The Entrance Plaz
Page 14 and 15:
Electrical: There is a series of ab
Page 16 and 17:
B. Bulkhead The bulkhead or seawall
Page 18 and 19:
C. Existing Pier The existing Pier
Page 20 and 21:
5. Navigational Access The current
Page 22 and 23:
Meeting with City Engineers 6/28 A
Page 55 and 56:
Meeting Minutes (Rev 01) project Th
Page 57:
CCONCEPTUAL FIRE SAFETY STRATEGY PR
Page 60 and 61:
6.0 RB initially expressed concern
Page 63 and 64:
idge, highway & rail engineering en
Page 65:
St. Petersburg Pier Page 3 MEG File
Page 69 and 70:
1509 W. Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tam
Page 71 and 72:
ERP Permit Application: New St. Pet
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
PART 3: A. Owner(s) of Land B. Appl
Page 81 and 82:
PART 8: A. If there have been any p
Page 83 and 84:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLI
Page 85 and 86:
5. Summarize impacts to wetlands an
Page 87 and 88:
E. Drainage Information 1. Provide
Page 89 and 90:
TABLE ONE: PROJECT WETLAND AND OTHE
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE THREE: PROJECT OFF-SITE MITIG
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE FIVE: SUMMARY OF SHORELINE ST
Page 96:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Soil Map-Pinellas County, Florida (
Page 105 and 106:
Page 120 and 121:
25 18 ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT 36
Page 122:
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT 36
Page 147 and 148:
TECHNICAL M E M O R A N D U M TO: F
Page 149 and 150:
St. Petersburg Pier - Environmental
Page 151 and 152:
St. Petersburg Pier - Environmental
Page 153 and 154:
G:\x\PROJECTS\002037_StPetePierEval
Page 155 and 156:
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT TECHNICAL ME
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163:
Page 175:
Page 213 and 214:
Underwater Feature Technical Worksh
Page 215 and 216:
6. Limestone definitely preferred f
Page 217 and 218:
Participant List Participant Peter
Page 219 and 220:
Dr. Betzer mentioned the names of s
Page 221 and 222:
Technical Interview 5 Summary of In
Page 223 and 224:
scientific community and the design
Page 225:
GHYDRODYNAMICS AND FLUSHING OF THE
Page 228 and 229:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Page 230 and 231:
LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 Location of St.
Page 232 and 233:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of St. Pe
Page 234 and 235:
loop structure. For the flushing ev
Page 236 and 237:
Figure 2-3b. Marina Construction De
Page 238 and 239:
Figure 2-4. Locations of NOAA Tide
Page 240 and 241:
3.0 MODELING APPROACH Based upon th
Page 242 and 243:
4.0 MODEL INPUTS 4.1 SIMULATION PER
Page 244 and 245:
Figure 4-2. Tampa Bay Model Grid in
Page 246 and 247:
Figure 4-4. Tampa Bay Model Grid in
Page 248 and 249:
Figure 4-5. Model Tidal forcing Fig
Page 250 and 251:
5.0 MODEL CALIBRATION 5.1 TIDES Fig
Page 252 and 253:
Available current data for the NOAA
Page 254 and 255:
6.0 EVALUATION OF FLUSHING IN MARIN
Page 256 and 257:
Figure 6-1c. Plan View Showing Flus
Page 258 and 259:
Figures 6-2a-e present time series
Page 260 and 261:
Figure 6-2e. Time Series Plot of Pe
Page 263:
HPIER ADVISORY TASK FORCE REPORT
Page 311 and 312:
Vision/Guiding Principles and Conte
Page 313 and 314:
Table of Contents (continued) SECTI
Page 315 and 316:
VISION The downtown waterfront is a
Page 317 and 318:
Guiding Principles (continued): Wa
Page 319 and 320:
Section II City Charter
Page 321 and 322:
Waterfront Park Element Downtown Ch
Page 323 and 324:
Evolution of the Current Waterfront
Page 325 and 326:
Planning Goals Five major planning
Page 327 and 328:
9. Comfort: a. Shade - Planting of
Page 329 and 330:
1988 Plan Implementation in the Wat
Page 331 and 332:
Art & Monuments Ordinance No. 2001-
Page 333 and 334:
Section V Downtown Waterfront Enter
Page 335 and 336: Albert Whitted Airport ● ● ●
Page 337 and 338: Al Lang Field (continued) ● ● O
Page 339 and 340: Section VI Waterfront Transportatio
Page 341 and 342: Traffic Access and Circulation ●
Page 343 and 344: Bicycle Pedestrian Pathway ● ●
Page 345 and 346: Daily Parking Demand ● ● ●
Page 347 and 348: Downtown Waterfront Events ● ●
Page 349: DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN IMP
Page 353 and 354: Chuck Jablon Project Executive, Acc
Page 355 and 356: OT Delancy Executive Support - SBE/
Page 357 and 358: Mark McLaughlin, LEED® AP Senior P
Page 359 and 360: Meoi Plummer Project Manager - Crow
Page 361 and 362: Tommy Ward Superintendent/Quality C
Page 363 and 364: Jake Krehbiel, LEED® AP Assistant
Page 365 and 366: Walter Benoit Project Controls Pers
Page 367 and 368: Mark Apaliski Preconstruction Perso
Page 369 and 370: Robert Ward Local SBE/WMBE Personal
Page 371: K ASCE 24-05: FLOOD RESISTANT DESIG
Page 374 and 375: . Specifications are provided for p
Page 376 and 377: See next page for description of Ca
Page 379: L CITY PIER BUILDING FOUNDATION EVA
Page 383 and 384: Memorandum March 1, 2010 Page 2 of
Page 385: Memorandum March 1, 2010 Page 4 of
Page 391 and 392: ESTIMATE DETAIL The Lens Estimate T
Page 393 and 394: Index Description Quantity Unit Cos
Page 413: Index Description Quantity Unit Cos
Page 417: The New St. Petersburg Pier Life Cy
Page 421: The New St. Petersburg Pier Revenue
Page 425: The New St. Petersburg Pier Annual
Page 429: OST. PETERSBURG PIER REQUEST FOR QU
Page 432 and 433: Pier Competition | Page 1 STAGE 1 P
Page 434 and 435: Pier Competition | Page 3 Vision IV
Page 436 and 437:
Pier Competition | Page 5 The Trans
Page 438 and 439:
Pier Competition | Page 7 VI. Compe
Page 440 and 441:
Pier Competition | Page 9 Relevant
Page 442 and 443:
Pier Competition | Page 11 The foll
Page 444 and 445:
Pier Competition | Page 13 Team Bac
Page 446 and 447:
Pier Competition | Page 15 Exhibit
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Pier Competition | Page 19 8. Debar
Page 452 and 453:
Pier Competition | Page 21 Disputes
Page 454 and 455:
Pier Competition | Page 23
Page 456:
Page 460:
MICHAEL MALTZAN ARCHITECTURE, INC.
show all

Basis of Design Book 2 - City of St. Petersburg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?