23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />

Figure 2. Species richness patterns based on voucher specimens (Albee et al. 1988), relative to a hexagonal grid sampling<br />

frame (EPA 649 km 2 sampling frame). Areas highest in species richness are shown in red, with lowest species<br />

richness shown in blue. Patterns of species richness generally correlate with elevation: the higher the richness, the<br />

higher the elevation (Ramsey and Shultz 2004).<br />

name, family name, growth form (tree, shrub, grass, or<br />

forb), known elevational range within <strong>Utah</strong>, acronym<br />

code (USDA PLANTS database), and notation as to<br />

whether the species is native or introduced. Rare plants<br />

are also highlighted in red on these checklists.<br />

Analysis of biodiversity patterns. The digital version<br />

allows reports of total species richness by ecoregion as<br />

well as diversity within a uniform grid system (Figure<br />

2). The layers also can be manipulated to analyze patterns<br />

of species diversity between ecoregions. For comparisons<br />

of ecoregions within the state, see Shultz and<br />

others (2000).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Anyone attempting to represent the distribution of a<br />

biological organism knows that distributions are not<br />

124<br />

static and that maps can do no better than represent the<br />

distribution of a species at a specified point in time.<br />

Changing landscapes have a profound effect on the distribution<br />

of a species. In addition, the development of<br />

an atlas of plants contains a number of inherent problems<br />

-- primarily regarding accurate identification and<br />

scale. Due to the diversity of the vascular plants (with<br />

more than 20,000 species in North America according to<br />

the Flora of North America Editorial Committee 1992--<br />

2006), reports of plant species generally cannot be<br />

trusted unless accompanied by a voucher specimen.<br />

That constraint severely limits the sample size and<br />

skews the kind of species represented by vouchers. In<br />

general, common species are under-represented in herbarium<br />

collections. However, rare occurrences are usually<br />

well-represented in herbarium collections and con-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!