December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />
Figure 4. Map of the Arizona distribution of Allium<br />
bigelovii based on Ownbey (1947).<br />
Figure 3. First collection of Allium bigelovii in Arizona,<br />
Palmer 532 Walnut Grove, Yavapai County.<br />
Allium bigelovii in New Mexico as “…a desert species<br />
of southwestern New Mexico”, therefore, a Chihuahuan<br />
Desert species. At the start of this study twenty six collections<br />
at Arizona herbaria (ARIZ, ASU, ATC, Grand<br />
Canyon National Park (GC), Museum of Northern Arizona<br />
(MNA), and BLM Safford [BLMS]), had been<br />
identified or annotated as A. bigelovii (Table 1). Based<br />
upon these annotations, A. bigelovii was widely variable<br />
in habitat from desert to chaparral, grassland, oak woodland,<br />
pinyon-juniper woodland, and ponderosa pine and<br />
wide ranging geographically from southeastern Arizona<br />
westward beyond Wickenburg into the Sonoran Desert<br />
and northwestward to the Hopi lands and the Grand<br />
Canyon on the Colorado Plateau (Figure 5). This situation<br />
made its identity as a species and its natural habitat<br />
in Arizona puzzling.<br />
By examining these collections, I determined that<br />
over half had been misidentified and only twelve were<br />
actually Allium bigelovii (Table 1). The misidentified<br />
collections were annotated by me to several other species,<br />
the majority (8) as A. bisceptrum var. palmeri,<br />
three as A. macropetalum, two as A. acuminatum, and<br />
one as A. atrorubens var. cristatum (Table 1). The large<br />
number of misidentifications of Allium bigelovii as A.<br />
bisceptrum var. palmeri was due to their pairing in the<br />
key in Kearney and Peebles (1960) and the vague species<br />
differentiation based on qualitative characters there.<br />
To make species determinations I used the two species’<br />
descriptions in Ownbey (1947) that included quantitative<br />
morphological characters as well as information on<br />
herbarium labels of habitat and geographic data. The<br />
basis for species definition was thus an evolutionary<br />
combination of morphology and ecology, a species’<br />
physical characters, and the niche a taxonomic entity<br />
occupies in nature. The refinement of the identity of A.<br />
bigelovii in Arizona combined with a knowledge of its<br />
habitat and range in New Mexico demonstrated that A.<br />
bigelovii is a Chihuahuan Desert species (Figure 6) that<br />
extends from southwestern New Mexico into southeastern<br />
Arizona (Figure 7) (Gunder AZ930-8 ASU; Lunt 6<br />
BLMS).<br />
The localities of the remaining Arizona collections of<br />
Allium bigelovii followed an interesting disjunct pattern<br />
of distribution that extended the range of A. bigelovii<br />
discontinuously on Mid-Late Tertiary lacustrine deposits<br />
across central Arizona. This relictual “steppingstone”<br />
pattern had been documented by me (Anderson<br />
1996) for many species of various floristic affinities including<br />
other Chihuahuan Desert species: Anulocaulis<br />
leisolenus (Torrey) Standl., Polygala scoparioides Chodat.,<br />
and Thamnosma texana (A. Gray) Torrey. The<br />
lacustrine deposits (Nations et al. 1982) containing A.<br />
57