23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change Among the<br />

Rarest <strong>Plant</strong>s of Nevada’s Great Basin<br />

Steve Caicco,<br />

Conservation Planner, Planning Branch, National Wildlife Refuge System,<br />

Portland, OR<br />

,<br />

Abstract. The Great Basin of Nevada provides habitat for many narrowly distributed endemic plant species. To assess<br />

the vulnerability of 33 of the rarest of these plants to climate change, I used the elevation range of all reported<br />

locations as a surrogate measure of their bioclimatic envelopes. The results show that 14 of these taxa occur on or<br />

near the valley floors, nine taxa occur in montane habitats, and 10 taxa occur at high elevations. While the majority of<br />

the 33 taxa are restricted to highly specialized edaphic habitats, valley endemics are distributed through a smaller elevation<br />

span than montane or high elevation endemics. In addition, valley habitats have less variability in slope and<br />

aspect and their highly specialized habitats do not occur above the valley floor. These habitat restrictions are likely to<br />

constrain migration in response to climate change. Montane and high elevation habitats are more diverse topographically<br />

and, although often specialized, are more common both locally and regionally. This imposes fewer constraints<br />

on natural migration and offers more conservation options in the face of climate change. Our inability to accurately<br />

predict the actual parameters of climate change and its effects at a scale relevant to rare species will require a comprehensive<br />

inventory and monitoring effort to identify those species affected by climate change. An integrated long-term<br />

seed storage program will ensure adequate representation for genetic conservation.<br />

Pollen, woodrat midden, tree-ring, and lake level<br />

data spanning the past 50,000 years has demonstrated<br />

that the Great Basin is highly sensitive to climatic<br />

change (Wharton et al. 1990). During the 20 th Century,<br />

an average annual warming of 0.3 to 0.6 °C occurred<br />

and projections for the next century are for an additional<br />

rise of 2 to 5 °C (Cubashi et al. 2001; Wagner 2003).<br />

Alterations to the precipitation regimes are harder to<br />

predict, but seem likely to include a greater proportion<br />

falling as rain, decreasing winter snowpack, and earlier<br />

arrival of spring conditions, thereby affecting runoff and<br />

plant phenology (Mote et al. 2005; Snyder and Sloan<br />

2005).<br />

The basin-and-range topography that characterizes<br />

the Great Basin of Nevada has generated much interest<br />

among biogeographers and numerous seminal works<br />

have been published focused on the distribution and relationship<br />

of its vascular flora or specific aspects of<br />

plant endemism in this region (Billings 1978; Charlet<br />

1996; Harper and Reveal 1978; Holmgren 1972a; Pavlik<br />

1989; Reveal 1979; Shreve 1942; Wells 1983). A published<br />

proceedings of a symposium on intermountain<br />

geography includes numerous papers on many aspects<br />

of biogeography in the Great Basin (Harper and Reveal<br />

1978). Several sources of information are available on<br />

the rare plants of Nevada (Morefield 2001; Mozingo<br />

and Williams 1980) or parts of Nevada (Anderson et al.<br />

1991; Spahr et al. 1991; Weixelman and Atwood undated).<br />

A conservation blueprint for the Great Basin has<br />

been prepared that includes general discussions of the<br />

ecological systems represented and their associated species<br />

conservation targets and identifies a portfolio of 20<br />

priority landscape scale conservation sites; climate<br />

change and adaptation options are also discussed but no<br />

explicit assessment of species vulnerability was conducted<br />

(Nachlinger et al. 2001).<br />

Narrowly endemic plants are expected to be at far<br />

greater risk of extinction from climate change than are<br />

more widespread plants because of their limited range,<br />

small populations, and genetic isolation (Committee on<br />

Environment and Natural Resources 2008; Peters and<br />

Darling 1985). Alpine plants are often identified as at<br />

particular risk due to isolation and lack of an “escape<br />

route” (Grabherr et al. 1995; Halloy and Mark 2003).<br />

Among the observed and predicted effects of climate<br />

change on plant species are phenological changes, trophic<br />

level disruptions, range shifts and contractions, and<br />

extinctions (Parmesan 2006). Documented effects include<br />

an accelerated trend in upward shift of alpine<br />

plants in the Swiss Alps over the last few decades<br />

(Walther et al. 2005), a significant upward shift in optimum<br />

elevation of forest plants in Europe in the 20 th century<br />

(Lenoir et al. 2008), a decline of arctic-alpine plants<br />

from 1989-2002 in Glacier National Park (Lesica and<br />

McCune 2004), and an advance in the mean flowering<br />

dates of lilac and honeysuckle in the western United<br />

States of 2 and 3.8 days per decade, respectively (Cayan<br />

et al. 2001).<br />

Extinction is predicted for 3–21 percent of the flora<br />

in Europe, 38–45 percent in the Cerrado of Brazil, 32–<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!