December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />
Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change Among the<br />
Rarest <strong>Plant</strong>s of Nevada’s Great Basin<br />
Steve Caicco,<br />
Conservation Planner, Planning Branch, National Wildlife Refuge System,<br />
Portland, OR<br />
,<br />
Abstract. The Great Basin of Nevada provides habitat for many narrowly distributed endemic plant species. To assess<br />
the vulnerability of 33 of the rarest of these plants to climate change, I used the elevation range of all reported<br />
locations as a surrogate measure of their bioclimatic envelopes. The results show that 14 of these taxa occur on or<br />
near the valley floors, nine taxa occur in montane habitats, and 10 taxa occur at high elevations. While the majority of<br />
the 33 taxa are restricted to highly specialized edaphic habitats, valley endemics are distributed through a smaller elevation<br />
span than montane or high elevation endemics. In addition, valley habitats have less variability in slope and<br />
aspect and their highly specialized habitats do not occur above the valley floor. These habitat restrictions are likely to<br />
constrain migration in response to climate change. Montane and high elevation habitats are more diverse topographically<br />
and, although often specialized, are more common both locally and regionally. This imposes fewer constraints<br />
on natural migration and offers more conservation options in the face of climate change. Our inability to accurately<br />
predict the actual parameters of climate change and its effects at a scale relevant to rare species will require a comprehensive<br />
inventory and monitoring effort to identify those species affected by climate change. An integrated long-term<br />
seed storage program will ensure adequate representation for genetic conservation.<br />
Pollen, woodrat midden, tree-ring, and lake level<br />
data spanning the past 50,000 years has demonstrated<br />
that the Great Basin is highly sensitive to climatic<br />
change (Wharton et al. 1990). During the 20 th Century,<br />
an average annual warming of 0.3 to 0.6 °C occurred<br />
and projections for the next century are for an additional<br />
rise of 2 to 5 °C (Cubashi et al. 2001; Wagner 2003).<br />
Alterations to the precipitation regimes are harder to<br />
predict, but seem likely to include a greater proportion<br />
falling as rain, decreasing winter snowpack, and earlier<br />
arrival of spring conditions, thereby affecting runoff and<br />
plant phenology (Mote et al. 2005; Snyder and Sloan<br />
2005).<br />
The basin-and-range topography that characterizes<br />
the Great Basin of Nevada has generated much interest<br />
among biogeographers and numerous seminal works<br />
have been published focused on the distribution and relationship<br />
of its vascular flora or specific aspects of<br />
plant endemism in this region (Billings 1978; Charlet<br />
1996; Harper and Reveal 1978; Holmgren 1972a; Pavlik<br />
1989; Reveal 1979; Shreve 1942; Wells 1983). A published<br />
proceedings of a symposium on intermountain<br />
geography includes numerous papers on many aspects<br />
of biogeography in the Great Basin (Harper and Reveal<br />
1978). Several sources of information are available on<br />
the rare plants of Nevada (Morefield 2001; Mozingo<br />
and Williams 1980) or parts of Nevada (Anderson et al.<br />
1991; Spahr et al. 1991; Weixelman and Atwood undated).<br />
A conservation blueprint for the Great Basin has<br />
been prepared that includes general discussions of the<br />
ecological systems represented and their associated species<br />
conservation targets and identifies a portfolio of 20<br />
priority landscape scale conservation sites; climate<br />
change and adaptation options are also discussed but no<br />
explicit assessment of species vulnerability was conducted<br />
(Nachlinger et al. 2001).<br />
Narrowly endemic plants are expected to be at far<br />
greater risk of extinction from climate change than are<br />
more widespread plants because of their limited range,<br />
small populations, and genetic isolation (Committee on<br />
Environment and Natural Resources 2008; Peters and<br />
Darling 1985). Alpine plants are often identified as at<br />
particular risk due to isolation and lack of an “escape<br />
route” (Grabherr et al. 1995; Halloy and Mark 2003).<br />
Among the observed and predicted effects of climate<br />
change on plant species are phenological changes, trophic<br />
level disruptions, range shifts and contractions, and<br />
extinctions (Parmesan 2006). Documented effects include<br />
an accelerated trend in upward shift of alpine<br />
plants in the Swiss Alps over the last few decades<br />
(Walther et al. 2005), a significant upward shift in optimum<br />
elevation of forest plants in Europe in the 20 th century<br />
(Lenoir et al. 2008), a decline of arctic-alpine plants<br />
from 1989-2002 in Glacier National Park (Lesica and<br />
McCune 2004), and an advance in the mean flowering<br />
dates of lilac and honeysuckle in the western United<br />
States of 2 and 3.8 days per decade, respectively (Cayan<br />
et al. 2001).<br />
Extinction is predicted for 3–21 percent of the flora<br />
in Europe, 38–45 percent in the Cerrado of Brazil, 32–<br />
91