23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />

Table 2. List of 24 morphological characters and<br />

their abbreviations used in the 153 specimen<br />

Palantia PCoA. Two were constant (C: calyxd, calyxo)<br />

and not used in the PCoA, parsimony or cluster<br />

analysis. One (O: calyxs) was not used due to the finding<br />

that it was variable on the same plant (and within<br />

most calyces). For a list of character states for the characters<br />

below, see Appendix 2. Characters were coded as<br />

multistate continuous variation (R), binary state (B), or<br />

multistate (M).<br />

1. Adaxial leaflet pubescence (Leafad) M<br />

2. Abaxial leaflet pubescence (Leafab) M<br />

3. Leaf and stem hair length (leafh) R<br />

4. Leaflet number (leafn) M<br />

5. Inflorescence length in flower (inflw) R<br />

6. Calyx tube length (calyxl) R<br />

7. Calyx pubescence density (calyxd) M, C<br />

8. Calyx teeth shape (calyxs) M, O<br />

9. Calyx teeth orientation (calyxo) M, C<br />

10. Keel length (keell) R<br />

11. Keel color (keelc) M<br />

12. Banner color (bannc) M<br />

13. Inflorescence length in fruit (infr) R<br />

14. Pod pedicel orientation (podpo) M<br />

15. Pod length X width ratio (podr) R<br />

16. Pod deciduous or persistent (poddp) B<br />

17. Pod shape, longitudinal section (podsl) M<br />

18. Pod shape, cross section (podsc) M<br />

19. Pod orientation on raceme (podro) M<br />

20. Pod orientation, degree of pod incurve (podpi) R<br />

21. Pod inflation (podin) M<br />

22. Pod valve texture (podt) M<br />

23. Pod pubescence (podpu) M<br />

24. Pod valve color (podvc) M<br />

scarcely inflated, unilocular, leathery, deciduous pods),<br />

and not to members of Section Inflati (4-6 base pair divergence;<br />

Alexander, unpublished data, Wojciechowski<br />

et al. 1993, 1999). The ITS sequence data suggest that a<br />

deciduous, unilocular, leathery, scarcely inflated pod is<br />

the putative ancestral state in this complex. Based, in<br />

part, on these data, members of Section Argophylli were<br />

used as outgroups for chloroplast haplotype analyses in<br />

Knaus (2008). Taxa in other putatively closely related<br />

sections (Section Monoenses Barneby, Section Cystiella<br />

Barneby, Section Circumdati (M.E. Jones) Barneby, or<br />

Section Platytropides Barneby; all of which have taxa<br />

with inflated pods) have not been fully investigated in<br />

molecular analyses. The selection of any member of<br />

Section Argophylli as an outgroup automatically polarizes<br />

the ancestral state of the group as a unilocular or<br />

partially bilocular, scarcely inflated, deciduous pod. In<br />

addition, haplotypes within the Argophylli sampled by<br />

Knaus (2008) were found to be nearly twenty steps<br />

more distant from the haplotypes examined in the<br />

Palantia. Finding that A. lentiginosus var. iodanthus and<br />

A. lentiginosus var. pseudiodanthus (both of which have<br />

been universally delimited as species until Alexander<br />

2009), are not highly genetically or morphologically<br />

distinct from A. lentiginosus is a problem for outgroup<br />

selection in this study, primarily with the parsimony<br />

analysis and the genetic analyses (Alexander & Liston,<br />

in prep). The terminal taxa in this study are also not recognized<br />

at the species level, which violates assumptions<br />

in parsimony analyses. As a result, robust phylogenetic<br />

conclusions cannot be made with these data.<br />

Instead, the cladistic analyses were used to investigate<br />

patterns of character state changes within the<br />

Palantia. Astragalus lentiginosus var. iodanthus, and A.<br />

lentiginosus var. pseudiodanthus were selected as outgroups<br />

based on their relatively greater genetic and morphologic<br />

distance from the Palantia based on the results<br />

from Alexander (2008), Knaus (2008), and Alexander &<br />

Liston (in prep). Even if the inflated varieties related to<br />

A. lentiginosus var. yuccanus were used as outgroups<br />

for the Palantia, the morphological trends discussed<br />

herein would not change (see Figures 5-8) since the major<br />

clades of the Palantia would still be split in two<br />

clades. More thorough molecular analyses of species<br />

potentially closely related to Section Diphysi (with both<br />

inflated and scarcely inflated pods) are needed before a<br />

robust molecular and morphological phylogenetic study,<br />

with a satisfactory outgroup, can be attempted.<br />

Despite this, conclusions of the taxonomic status of<br />

Astragalus lentiginosus var. maricopae and A. lentiginosus<br />

var. ursinus can be made. The results of the PCoA<br />

analyses and the genetic analyses (Alexander & Liston,<br />

in prep) indicate that species level delimitations for<br />

many of the Palantia have much weaker support than<br />

previously thought by Alexander (2005). Astragalus<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!