December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />
Table 2. List of 24 morphological characters and<br />
their abbreviations used in the 153 specimen<br />
Palantia PCoA. Two were constant (C: calyxd, calyxo)<br />
and not used in the PCoA, parsimony or cluster<br />
analysis. One (O: calyxs) was not used due to the finding<br />
that it was variable on the same plant (and within<br />
most calyces). For a list of character states for the characters<br />
below, see Appendix 2. Characters were coded as<br />
multistate continuous variation (R), binary state (B), or<br />
multistate (M).<br />
1. Adaxial leaflet pubescence (Leafad) M<br />
2. Abaxial leaflet pubescence (Leafab) M<br />
3. Leaf and stem hair length (leafh) R<br />
4. Leaflet number (leafn) M<br />
5. Inflorescence length in flower (inflw) R<br />
6. Calyx tube length (calyxl) R<br />
7. Calyx pubescence density (calyxd) M, C<br />
8. Calyx teeth shape (calyxs) M, O<br />
9. Calyx teeth orientation (calyxo) M, C<br />
10. Keel length (keell) R<br />
11. Keel color (keelc) M<br />
12. Banner color (bannc) M<br />
13. Inflorescence length in fruit (infr) R<br />
14. Pod pedicel orientation (podpo) M<br />
15. Pod length X width ratio (podr) R<br />
16. Pod deciduous or persistent (poddp) B<br />
17. Pod shape, longitudinal section (podsl) M<br />
18. Pod shape, cross section (podsc) M<br />
19. Pod orientation on raceme (podro) M<br />
20. Pod orientation, degree of pod incurve (podpi) R<br />
21. Pod inflation (podin) M<br />
22. Pod valve texture (podt) M<br />
23. Pod pubescence (podpu) M<br />
24. Pod valve color (podvc) M<br />
scarcely inflated, unilocular, leathery, deciduous pods),<br />
and not to members of Section Inflati (4-6 base pair divergence;<br />
Alexander, unpublished data, Wojciechowski<br />
et al. 1993, 1999). The ITS sequence data suggest that a<br />
deciduous, unilocular, leathery, scarcely inflated pod is<br />
the putative ancestral state in this complex. Based, in<br />
part, on these data, members of Section Argophylli were<br />
used as outgroups for chloroplast haplotype analyses in<br />
Knaus (2008). Taxa in other putatively closely related<br />
sections (Section Monoenses Barneby, Section Cystiella<br />
Barneby, Section Circumdati (M.E. Jones) Barneby, or<br />
Section Platytropides Barneby; all of which have taxa<br />
with inflated pods) have not been fully investigated in<br />
molecular analyses. The selection of any member of<br />
Section Argophylli as an outgroup automatically polarizes<br />
the ancestral state of the group as a unilocular or<br />
partially bilocular, scarcely inflated, deciduous pod. In<br />
addition, haplotypes within the Argophylli sampled by<br />
Knaus (2008) were found to be nearly twenty steps<br />
more distant from the haplotypes examined in the<br />
Palantia. Finding that A. lentiginosus var. iodanthus and<br />
A. lentiginosus var. pseudiodanthus (both of which have<br />
been universally delimited as species until Alexander<br />
2009), are not highly genetically or morphologically<br />
distinct from A. lentiginosus is a problem for outgroup<br />
selection in this study, primarily with the parsimony<br />
analysis and the genetic analyses (Alexander & Liston,<br />
in prep). The terminal taxa in this study are also not recognized<br />
at the species level, which violates assumptions<br />
in parsimony analyses. As a result, robust phylogenetic<br />
conclusions cannot be made with these data.<br />
Instead, the cladistic analyses were used to investigate<br />
patterns of character state changes within the<br />
Palantia. Astragalus lentiginosus var. iodanthus, and A.<br />
lentiginosus var. pseudiodanthus were selected as outgroups<br />
based on their relatively greater genetic and morphologic<br />
distance from the Palantia based on the results<br />
from Alexander (2008), Knaus (2008), and Alexander &<br />
Liston (in prep). Even if the inflated varieties related to<br />
A. lentiginosus var. yuccanus were used as outgroups<br />
for the Palantia, the morphological trends discussed<br />
herein would not change (see Figures 5-8) since the major<br />
clades of the Palantia would still be split in two<br />
clades. More thorough molecular analyses of species<br />
potentially closely related to Section Diphysi (with both<br />
inflated and scarcely inflated pods) are needed before a<br />
robust molecular and morphological phylogenetic study,<br />
with a satisfactory outgroup, can be attempted.<br />
Despite this, conclusions of the taxonomic status of<br />
Astragalus lentiginosus var. maricopae and A. lentiginosus<br />
var. ursinus can be made. The results of the PCoA<br />
analyses and the genetic analyses (Alexander & Liston,<br />
in prep) indicate that species level delimitations for<br />
many of the Palantia have much weaker support than<br />
previously thought by Alexander (2005). Astragalus<br />
140