December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />
were established by the U.S. Forest Service, but results<br />
were inconclusive (Nagiller 1992). We initiated a study<br />
in 1992 to test the hypothesis that restoration of historic<br />
ecosystem conditions may enhance the sustainability of<br />
this species (Fulé et al. 2001). This study encompassed<br />
several components, including seed germination studies,<br />
a field seeding trial, a prescribed burning study and a<br />
trenching experiment. We initiated the prescribed burning<br />
component in 1994 to test the hypothesis that prescribed<br />
fire would increase P. clutei density by removing<br />
litter and competing vegetation. The results suggest<br />
that prescribed burning caused a significant decline in<br />
density by as much as 75%. However, density also declined<br />
in two of the three control areas (in one area also<br />
by as much as 75%). So, while prescribed burning appears<br />
to be responsible for the death of mature plants,<br />
natural population declines may also occur in the absence<br />
of disturbance.<br />
After evaluating results from the prescribed burning<br />
experiment, we investigated the possibility that vigorous<br />
responses following fires were a result of mortality of<br />
overstory trees and removal of root competition (Fulé et<br />
al. 2001). We initiated a study in 1998 to test the hypothesis<br />
that cutting root competition through trenching<br />
would increase P. clutei density. In 1999, one year following<br />
the trenching, there was a significant difference<br />
in density between trenched (mean of 104.9 plants/plot)<br />
and control plots (14.0 plants/plot), mostly in the form<br />
of seedlings. By 2000, densities had declined to an average<br />
of 30.6 vs. 1.5 plants in the trenched and control<br />
plots, respectively, mostly due to the death of seedlings.<br />
Two preliminary conclusions were drawn from the<br />
trenching study: 1) trenching had a positive effect on P.<br />
clutei reproduction, and this trend was still evident a<br />
year later, and 2) increases in P. clutei were likely due<br />
to reduced root competition with overstory trees. Although<br />
our earlier germination experiments indicated<br />
that P. clutei did not exhibit innate seed dormancy under<br />
laboratory conditions (see Fulé et al. 2001), we were<br />
puzzled over the dramatic field response to root trenching.<br />
A field seeding trial of P. clutei showed very poor<br />
rates of establishment (0.1-0.6%), with no seedlings establishing<br />
after an April seeding, and only a minimal<br />
number establishing following an October seeding (Fulé<br />
et al. 2001). Determining whether P. clutei maintains a<br />
persistent soil seed bank is crucial for conservation and<br />
management efforts. The combined results from our<br />
previous studies suggest that it does not form a persistent<br />
seed bank, that there may be dissimilarities in germination<br />
rates between plants from different habitats,<br />
and that field emergence is extremely low and/or seedling<br />
mortality is high. Collecting P. clutei seeds from<br />
additional habitats could yield new information on<br />
whether this species exhibits cyclic dormancy patterns<br />
or dormancy that differs in contrasting habitats.<br />
It remains largely unknown, then, how long populations<br />
of P. clutei plants persist on the landscape following<br />
disturbance, what mechanism this species employs<br />
to colonize an area following disturbance, or how it is<br />
able to disperse across the landscape. In an effort to gain<br />
answers to some of these questions, we revisited the<br />
study area ten years after root trenching and 13-14 years<br />
following prescribed burning. Our objectives were to<br />
assess the long-term effects of the prescribed burning<br />
and trenching treatments and to evaluate the importance<br />
of a persistent seed bank in population dynamics.<br />
METHODS<br />
Fulé and others (2001) described methods of our previous<br />
prescribed burning and root trenching studies in<br />
detail, but we will also summarize them here. The experimental<br />
studies described in this and the 2001 paper<br />
were established in 1992-1994 and conducted on Coconino<br />
National Forest lands in the vicinity of O'Leary<br />
Peak, adjacent to Sunset Crater National Monument<br />
(Figure 1). The elevation of the study area is approximately<br />
2100-2300 m (6890-7550 ft). Soils are cindery<br />
and deep, well-drained Vitrandic Ustochrepts and Typic<br />
Ustorthents (Miller et al. 1995). Weather records from<br />
Sunset Crater National Monument, 1 km south of the<br />
study area, include an annual precipitation average of<br />
42.7 cm (16.8 in) (1969-2008), with most precipitation<br />
occurring in winter and during the summer monsoon<br />
(July-September). However, annual precipitation has<br />
varied widely in recent decades from a low of 23.6 cm<br />
(9.3 in) in 1989 to 66 cm (26.0 in) in 1992. The average<br />
minimum temperature in January is -11 o C and the average<br />
maximum temperature in July is 29 o C.<br />
We established an experiment to study the effects of<br />
prescribed burning on the P. clutei community in 1994.<br />
Forty P. clutei plant-centered plots were established,<br />
each with a 2.5 m radius circle (area = 19.6 m 2 ) centered<br />
0.3 m northwest of an existing plant. P. clutei was tallied<br />
in four categories: seedling, second-year plant, mature<br />
plant, and dead. Field experience indicated that the<br />
distinctions between the living plant categories were<br />
approximate. Plots were randomly selected for burn or<br />
control treatments, and burning was conducted in September<br />
1994. Burn season effects were tested on a second<br />
experimental site immediately north of the fall<br />
burning site, and twenty randomly selected plots were<br />
burned in April 1995. The fall burn plots were re-measured<br />
in July 1995. All 80 plots, including spring and fall<br />
burns, were re-measured in August/September 1996;<br />
August 1997; August 1998; and August/September<br />
2008. Changes in P. clutei density were analyzed with<br />
repeated measures analysis of variance (Systat 8.0,<br />
SPSS Science, Chicago). Data were square-root transformed<br />
to meet ANOVA assumptions. In 2008, data<br />
166