December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />
ilar morphologically than A. lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />
is to A. lentiginosus var. wilsonii. The morphological<br />
similarity and geographic proximity of A. lentiginosus<br />
var. mokiacensis and A. lentiginosus var. ursinus (the<br />
nearest populations are at least 20 km apart in adjacent<br />
mountain ranges) has been the primary evidence for<br />
placing them into the same taxon in the latest monograph<br />
(Welsh 2007). The morphological distinctiveness<br />
of A. lentiginosus var. ursinus is subtle, but it is, nevertheless,<br />
present. In the A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />
PCoA analysis, specimens of A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />
appear to grade into the specimens of A. lentiginosus<br />
var. mokiacensis (including the type specimens of A.<br />
lentiginosus var. trumbullensis). The parsimony and<br />
cluster analyses also show A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />
in the same region of the tree as A. lentiginosus var.<br />
mokiacensis. However, A. lentiginosus var. ursinus does<br />
not share haplotypes with A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis.<br />
It shares the most haplotypes with A. lentiginosus<br />
var. wilsonii (Alexander & Liston, in prep). Based on<br />
the lack of shared haplotypes with A. lentiginosus var.<br />
mokiacensis and a trend toward smaller pods and flowers<br />
(see the taxonomic treatment below for more specific<br />
morphological differences), A. lentiginosus var.<br />
ursinus is recognized herein at the varietal level following<br />
the delimitation proposed by Barneby (1945, 1964).<br />
Taxonomic Treatment<br />
The taxonomic revision herein is a first step in a full<br />
monograph of the Astragalus lentiginosus complex. As<br />
such, the specimens used in the morphological analysis<br />
are labeled in a separate voucher list. Where applicable,<br />
a list of specimens examined by the author but not yet<br />
included in morphological analyses is also included.<br />
Species delimitations in the taxonomic revision follow a<br />
phenetic species concept (Sokal, 1973; Luckow 1995).<br />
The original goal of this study was to apply a phylogenetic<br />
species concept, however, the genetic and morphologic<br />
data obtained could not be analyzed robustly<br />
using cladistic methodologies. Primarily, population<br />
level data are largely ignored since the smallest taxonomic<br />
units of phylogenetic analyses are species (Nixon<br />
& Wheeler 1990, Cracraft 1983, Luckow 1995). Table 1<br />
is a list of notable specimens identified in maps in this<br />
revision. Following the key are complete taxonomic<br />
treatments for A. lentiginosus var. maricopae and A.<br />
lentiginosus var. ursinus. Treatments for the other taxa<br />
in the key can be found in Alexander (2008).<br />
Key to the Palantia and related varieties of Astragalus lentiginosus<br />
1. Pod, in longitudinal section, linear, lanceolate, oblong, or elliptic, the shape cylindrical and not inflated or ventricose<br />
and scarcely inflated dorsally or laterally, the valves stiffly papery to coriaceous, bilocular, semibilocular,<br />
or sub-unilocular, the septum to 2.5 mm wide and not fused to the funicular flange.<br />
2. Pods long-persistent, sessile on a minute boss on the receptacle or contracted at the base into an incipient stipe<br />
0.4 to 0.7 (1.0) mm long.<br />
3. Banner light yellow, without a central white or striped spot (immaculate); keel slightly darker than the banner,<br />
drying yellowish brown and immaculate; wings slightly darker than the banner, drying yellowish brown.<br />
…………………………………………………………………………………..A. lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />
3. Banner light to dark purple with a white & purple striate central spot; keel light purple & dark purple maculate;<br />
wings light to dark purple, sometimes with white tips.<br />
4. Pods straight or slightly incurved, 20-28 (-32) mm long, 4-7.1x longer than wide, the pedicel ascending or<br />
spreading, straight or curved; leaflets glabrous to moderately pubescent adaxially, at least sparsely<br />
pubescent abaxially; [=A. mokiacensis, A. lentiginosus var. trumbullensis]………………………………<br />
………………………………………………………………………………….A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />
4. Pods incurved, 13-20 (-23) mm long, 2.4-4.7x longer than wide; the pedicel ascending or erect, straight<br />
or curved; leaflets glabrous adaxially, glabrous or sparsely pubescent abaxially; [=A. ursinus] ……….<br />
………………………………………………………………………………………A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />
2. Pods deciduous (sometimes tardily so) by a cellular abscission layer between the receptacle and gynoecium,<br />
sessile on a minute boss on the receptacle or contracted at the base into an incipient stipe or gynophore 0.3 to<br />
0.5 (0.7) mm long.<br />
5. Pods semi-bilocular to nearly bilocular, the septum 1-2.5 mm wide, the body incurved 120-180°, incurved<br />
less than 90°, or straight, the valves in cross section cordate, obcordate, or terete, in longitudinal section<br />
elliptic, linear, or oblong.<br />
6. Pods falcate to hamate (nearly circular), occasionally lunate, incurved to 120-180°, the pedicel deflexed<br />
or declined…………………………………………………………………. A. lentiginosus var. palans<br />
6. Pods lunate to falcate, incurved less than 90° to nearly straight, the pedicel erect, ascending, or spreading.<br />
147