23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

ilar morphologically than A. lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />

is to A. lentiginosus var. wilsonii. The morphological<br />

similarity and geographic proximity of A. lentiginosus<br />

var. mokiacensis and A. lentiginosus var. ursinus (the<br />

nearest populations are at least 20 km apart in adjacent<br />

mountain ranges) has been the primary evidence for<br />

placing them into the same taxon in the latest monograph<br />

(Welsh 2007). The morphological distinctiveness<br />

of A. lentiginosus var. ursinus is subtle, but it is, nevertheless,<br />

present. In the A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />

PCoA analysis, specimens of A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />

appear to grade into the specimens of A. lentiginosus<br />

var. mokiacensis (including the type specimens of A.<br />

lentiginosus var. trumbullensis). The parsimony and<br />

cluster analyses also show A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />

in the same region of the tree as A. lentiginosus var.<br />

mokiacensis. However, A. lentiginosus var. ursinus does<br />

not share haplotypes with A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis.<br />

It shares the most haplotypes with A. lentiginosus<br />

var. wilsonii (Alexander & Liston, in prep). Based on<br />

the lack of shared haplotypes with A. lentiginosus var.<br />

mokiacensis and a trend toward smaller pods and flowers<br />

(see the taxonomic treatment below for more specific<br />

morphological differences), A. lentiginosus var.<br />

ursinus is recognized herein at the varietal level following<br />

the delimitation proposed by Barneby (1945, 1964).<br />

Taxonomic Treatment<br />

The taxonomic revision herein is a first step in a full<br />

monograph of the Astragalus lentiginosus complex. As<br />

such, the specimens used in the morphological analysis<br />

are labeled in a separate voucher list. Where applicable,<br />

a list of specimens examined by the author but not yet<br />

included in morphological analyses is also included.<br />

Species delimitations in the taxonomic revision follow a<br />

phenetic species concept (Sokal, 1973; Luckow 1995).<br />

The original goal of this study was to apply a phylogenetic<br />

species concept, however, the genetic and morphologic<br />

data obtained could not be analyzed robustly<br />

using cladistic methodologies. Primarily, population<br />

level data are largely ignored since the smallest taxonomic<br />

units of phylogenetic analyses are species (Nixon<br />

& Wheeler 1990, Cracraft 1983, Luckow 1995). Table 1<br />

is a list of notable specimens identified in maps in this<br />

revision. Following the key are complete taxonomic<br />

treatments for A. lentiginosus var. maricopae and A.<br />

lentiginosus var. ursinus. Treatments for the other taxa<br />

in the key can be found in Alexander (2008).<br />

Key to the Palantia and related varieties of Astragalus lentiginosus<br />

1. Pod, in longitudinal section, linear, lanceolate, oblong, or elliptic, the shape cylindrical and not inflated or ventricose<br />

and scarcely inflated dorsally or laterally, the valves stiffly papery to coriaceous, bilocular, semibilocular,<br />

or sub-unilocular, the septum to 2.5 mm wide and not fused to the funicular flange.<br />

2. Pods long-persistent, sessile on a minute boss on the receptacle or contracted at the base into an incipient stipe<br />

0.4 to 0.7 (1.0) mm long.<br />

3. Banner light yellow, without a central white or striped spot (immaculate); keel slightly darker than the banner,<br />

drying yellowish brown and immaculate; wings slightly darker than the banner, drying yellowish brown.<br />

…………………………………………………………………………………..A. lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />

3. Banner light to dark purple with a white & purple striate central spot; keel light purple & dark purple maculate;<br />

wings light to dark purple, sometimes with white tips.<br />

4. Pods straight or slightly incurved, 20-28 (-32) mm long, 4-7.1x longer than wide, the pedicel ascending or<br />

spreading, straight or curved; leaflets glabrous to moderately pubescent adaxially, at least sparsely<br />

pubescent abaxially; [=A. mokiacensis, A. lentiginosus var. trumbullensis]………………………………<br />

………………………………………………………………………………….A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />

4. Pods incurved, 13-20 (-23) mm long, 2.4-4.7x longer than wide; the pedicel ascending or erect, straight<br />

or curved; leaflets glabrous adaxially, glabrous or sparsely pubescent abaxially; [=A. ursinus] ……….<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………A. lentiginosus var. ursinus<br />

2. Pods deciduous (sometimes tardily so) by a cellular abscission layer between the receptacle and gynoecium,<br />

sessile on a minute boss on the receptacle or contracted at the base into an incipient stipe or gynophore 0.3 to<br />

0.5 (0.7) mm long.<br />

5. Pods semi-bilocular to nearly bilocular, the septum 1-2.5 mm wide, the body incurved 120-180°, incurved<br />

less than 90°, or straight, the valves in cross section cordate, obcordate, or terete, in longitudinal section<br />

elliptic, linear, or oblong.<br />

6. Pods falcate to hamate (nearly circular), occasionally lunate, incurved to 120-180°, the pedicel deflexed<br />

or declined…………………………………………………………………. A. lentiginosus var. palans<br />

6. Pods lunate to falcate, incurved less than 90° to nearly straight, the pedicel erect, ascending, or spreading.<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!