23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

RESULTS<br />

Distribution maps (Figures 1, 2) show the localities<br />

of specimens of Astragalus lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />

and A. lentiginosus var. ursinus examined for this study.<br />

Specific vouchers labeled in figures are shown in Table<br />

1. A detailed list of the vouchers examined can be found<br />

in the Taxonomic Treatment and in Appendix 1.<br />

Of the 24 morphological characters examined for the<br />

153 specimen Palantia PCoA, two were constant and<br />

not used (Table 2), one was discarded due to character<br />

state scoring issues, and 22 were variable. The first<br />

component of the PCoA explained 22.1% of the total<br />

variance (Table 3). The largest correlations to the first<br />

axis were from pod raceme orientation (podro), degree<br />

of pod incurve (podpi), pod pedicel orientation (podpo),<br />

banner color (bannc), and pod persistence (poddp). The<br />

second component of the PCoA explained 11.8% of the<br />

total variance. The largest correlations to the second<br />

axis were from pod pubescence (podpu), leaf abaxial<br />

pubescence (leafab), pod shape in cross section (podsc),<br />

and pod inflation (podin). All other components of the<br />

PCoA explained less than 10% of the total variance. The<br />

scatterplot of the first two components of the PCoA is<br />

shown in Figure 3.<br />

Of the 24 morphological characters examined for the<br />

43 specimen Astragalus lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />

PCoA, 12 were found to be variable in this subset of the<br />

data (Table 4). The first component of the PCoA explained<br />

48.4% of the total variation (Table 5). The largest<br />

correlations to the first axis were from pod shape in<br />

Figure 1. Distribution map of Astragalus lentiginosus<br />

var. maricopae in Arizona. The distributions of Astragalus<br />

lentiginosus var. bryantii and A. lentiginosus var.<br />

wilsonii are shown for reference. Table one contains the<br />

legend of letter codes used for specific vouchers shown.<br />

Vouchers and major populations are labeled as follows:<br />

(caret), A. lentiginosus var. bryantii; (upward triangle),<br />

A. lentiginosus var. maricopae; (circle), A. lentiginosus<br />

var. wilsonii; (X), Cameron population of A. lentiginosus<br />

var. wilsonii putatively intermediate to A. lentiginosus<br />

var. palans.<br />

Figure 2. Distribution map of Astragalus<br />

lentiginosus var. ursinus. The distribution<br />

of A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis<br />

is shown for reference. Table 1 contains<br />

the legend of letter codes used for<br />

specific vouchers shown. Taxa are labeled<br />

as follows: (X) A. lentiginosus var.<br />

ursinus; (upward triangle) A. lentiginosus<br />

var. mokiacensis, mokiacensis minor<br />

variant; (diamond) A. lentiginosus var.<br />

mokiacensis, Gold Butte minor variant;<br />

(caret) A. lentiginosus var. mokiacensis,<br />

trumbullensis minor variant. For a taxonomic<br />

treatment for the morphological<br />

variants shown herein for A. lentiginosus<br />

var. mokiacensis, see Alexander<br />

(2005, 2008).<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!