December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />
precipitation, the principal climatic factors affecting<br />
plant distribution in the Great Basin (Billings 1949;<br />
Comstock and Ehleringer 1992; Fautin 1946). Van de<br />
Ven and others (2007) used actual temperature and precipitation<br />
data to construct bioclimatic models of potential<br />
climatic change in the White Mountains of California<br />
and Nevada at the western edge of the Great Basin,<br />
but such data are relatively sparse for the interior Great<br />
Basin. Climate stations are typically clustered near<br />
towns and skewed toward lower elevations; there are<br />
few climate stations above 2500 m. Moreover, due to<br />
the complex topography of the Western United States<br />
and the coarse resolution of most climate models, even<br />
the best climate models display biases at regional scales<br />
(Bonfils et al. 2008). All 33 taxa are highly localized<br />
endemics with geographic ranges that are considerably<br />
smaller than could be predicted by the best regional climate<br />
models.<br />
While approaches that incorporate additional factors<br />
such as slope, aspect, and geologic substrate have been<br />
used with some success to develop predictive models of<br />
potential habitat for a few rare plants in the Great Basin<br />
of <strong>Utah</strong> (Aitken and others 2007), field surveys conducted<br />
by experienced botanists for many of these 33<br />
taxa have consistently found that only a small portion of<br />
their predicted range contains suitable habitat. Therefore,<br />
the objective of this study was to compare the climatic<br />
niches of rare plants, rather than to develop predictive<br />
distribution models.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The rarest plants of the Great Basin of Nevada (i.e.,<br />
those with a G1, G1G2, or T1 rank) can be placed into<br />
three broad elevation bands. Those bands reflect occurrence:<br />
1) below the lower limits of tree distribution on<br />
or near valley floors; 2) within a narrow montane zone<br />
dominated by pinyon-juniper woodlands and associated<br />
shrublands or subalpine; or 3) near or above timberline<br />
(Figure 2, Table 1).<br />
The lowest elevation group is comprised of 14 taxa<br />
that have a median population altitude below 2000 m.<br />
All but one of these taxa are endemic to Nevada (Figure<br />
2). Eleven taxa, Eriogonum tiehmii, E. argophyllum,<br />
E. ovalifolium var. williamsiae, E. diatomaceum, Castilleja<br />
salsuginosa, Johanneshowellia crateriorum,<br />
Boechera falcifructa, Mentzelia argillicola, M. tiehmii,<br />
Frasera gypsicola, and Potentilla basaltica have a reported<br />
elevational amplitude of less than 244 m, with<br />
nine of these distributed across less than 129 m of elevation<br />
(Figure 2). Two additional species, Sclerocactus<br />
blainei and Mimulus ovatus, are reported from an elevational<br />
amplitude of less than 50 m. The lone anomaly to<br />
the general pattern of restricted elevational range among<br />
the lowest elevation group was Penstemon floribundus,<br />
with populations spanning 1,009 m.<br />
The middle elevation group is comprised of nine<br />
taxa, all but one of which are thought to occur only in<br />
Nevada (Figure 2). The median altitudes of all known<br />
populations of these taxa fell between 2,000 m and<br />
2,746 m, although three taxa have some populations<br />
near or above 3,000 m. Six of these taxa, Tonestus graniticus,<br />
Lewisia maguirei, Collomia renacta, Eriogonum<br />
microthecum var. arceuthinum, E. douglasii var.<br />
elkoense, and Trifolium andinum var. podocephalum<br />
had elevational amplitudes of less than 280 m. This relatively<br />
narrow elevation span is comparable to those<br />
typical of the valley taxa, and an argument could be<br />
made to make only two groupings based on a division at<br />
2,500 m (Figure 2). Such a division would, however,<br />
mask an ecological distinction based on a notable difference<br />
between valley and montane endemics in their edaphic<br />
specialization, discussed in more detail in the following<br />
section. The remaining three taxa, Penstemon<br />
tiehmii, P. pudicus, and P. moriahensis had reported<br />
elevational amplitudes of 640 m, 782 m, and 1,128 m,<br />
respectively.<br />
The highest elevation group is comprised of ten taxa,<br />
seven of which are considered endemic to Nevada. Only<br />
three of the ten taxa, Draba serpentina, Boechera<br />
ophira, and Ipomopsis congesta var. nevadensis had<br />
reported elevational amplitudes of less than 200 m. Two<br />
taxa, Primula capillaris and Penstemon rhizomatosus,<br />
had reported elevational amplitudes of 381 m and 366<br />
m, respectively. The remaining five taxa, Viola lithion,<br />
Eriogonum holmgrenii, Potentilla cottami, Polemonium<br />
chartaceum, and Cymopterus goodrichii had reported<br />
elevational amplitudes between 747 m and 1,158 m.<br />
Only three, Polemonium chartaceum, Eriogonum holmgrenii,<br />
and Draba serpentina, were restricted to sites<br />
above treeline (Figure 2).<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Overview<br />
Many of the rarest plant taxa in the Great Basin of<br />
Nevada are found below the lower limits of tree distribution.<br />
These low elevation taxa (median elevation below<br />
2,000 m) had the narrowest bioclimatic envelope, as<br />
estimated from their reported elevational amplitudes,<br />
with 11 of 14 (79 percent) spanning less than 244 m. If<br />
other elevation bands are considered, 17 of the 20 taxa<br />
(85 percent) with an elevational span of less than 280 m<br />
have a median elevation below 2,377 m (Figure 2).<br />
Among the ten highest elevation taxa, only three (30<br />
percent) have a reported elevational amplitude of less<br />
than 200 m (one of these is likely more widely distributed<br />
as discussed below), and four of them (40 percent)<br />
are known to occur over more than 700 m of elevation.<br />
These results oppose the prediction that alpine species<br />
are at particular risk due to isolation and lack of an<br />
93