23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

precipitation, the principal climatic factors affecting<br />

plant distribution in the Great Basin (Billings 1949;<br />

Comstock and Ehleringer 1992; Fautin 1946). Van de<br />

Ven and others (2007) used actual temperature and precipitation<br />

data to construct bioclimatic models of potential<br />

climatic change in the White Mountains of California<br />

and Nevada at the western edge of the Great Basin,<br />

but such data are relatively sparse for the interior Great<br />

Basin. Climate stations are typically clustered near<br />

towns and skewed toward lower elevations; there are<br />

few climate stations above 2500 m. Moreover, due to<br />

the complex topography of the Western United States<br />

and the coarse resolution of most climate models, even<br />

the best climate models display biases at regional scales<br />

(Bonfils et al. 2008). All 33 taxa are highly localized<br />

endemics with geographic ranges that are considerably<br />

smaller than could be predicted by the best regional climate<br />

models.<br />

While approaches that incorporate additional factors<br />

such as slope, aspect, and geologic substrate have been<br />

used with some success to develop predictive models of<br />

potential habitat for a few rare plants in the Great Basin<br />

of <strong>Utah</strong> (Aitken and others 2007), field surveys conducted<br />

by experienced botanists for many of these 33<br />

taxa have consistently found that only a small portion of<br />

their predicted range contains suitable habitat. Therefore,<br />

the objective of this study was to compare the climatic<br />

niches of rare plants, rather than to develop predictive<br />

distribution models.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The rarest plants of the Great Basin of Nevada (i.e.,<br />

those with a G1, G1G2, or T1 rank) can be placed into<br />

three broad elevation bands. Those bands reflect occurrence:<br />

1) below the lower limits of tree distribution on<br />

or near valley floors; 2) within a narrow montane zone<br />

dominated by pinyon-juniper woodlands and associated<br />

shrublands or subalpine; or 3) near or above timberline<br />

(Figure 2, Table 1).<br />

The lowest elevation group is comprised of 14 taxa<br />

that have a median population altitude below 2000 m.<br />

All but one of these taxa are endemic to Nevada (Figure<br />

2). Eleven taxa, Eriogonum tiehmii, E. argophyllum,<br />

E. ovalifolium var. williamsiae, E. diatomaceum, Castilleja<br />

salsuginosa, Johanneshowellia crateriorum,<br />

Boechera falcifructa, Mentzelia argillicola, M. tiehmii,<br />

Frasera gypsicola, and Potentilla basaltica have a reported<br />

elevational amplitude of less than 244 m, with<br />

nine of these distributed across less than 129 m of elevation<br />

(Figure 2). Two additional species, Sclerocactus<br />

blainei and Mimulus ovatus, are reported from an elevational<br />

amplitude of less than 50 m. The lone anomaly to<br />

the general pattern of restricted elevational range among<br />

the lowest elevation group was Penstemon floribundus,<br />

with populations spanning 1,009 m.<br />

The middle elevation group is comprised of nine<br />

taxa, all but one of which are thought to occur only in<br />

Nevada (Figure 2). The median altitudes of all known<br />

populations of these taxa fell between 2,000 m and<br />

2,746 m, although three taxa have some populations<br />

near or above 3,000 m. Six of these taxa, Tonestus graniticus,<br />

Lewisia maguirei, Collomia renacta, Eriogonum<br />

microthecum var. arceuthinum, E. douglasii var.<br />

elkoense, and Trifolium andinum var. podocephalum<br />

had elevational amplitudes of less than 280 m. This relatively<br />

narrow elevation span is comparable to those<br />

typical of the valley taxa, and an argument could be<br />

made to make only two groupings based on a division at<br />

2,500 m (Figure 2). Such a division would, however,<br />

mask an ecological distinction based on a notable difference<br />

between valley and montane endemics in their edaphic<br />

specialization, discussed in more detail in the following<br />

section. The remaining three taxa, Penstemon<br />

tiehmii, P. pudicus, and P. moriahensis had reported<br />

elevational amplitudes of 640 m, 782 m, and 1,128 m,<br />

respectively.<br />

The highest elevation group is comprised of ten taxa,<br />

seven of which are considered endemic to Nevada. Only<br />

three of the ten taxa, Draba serpentina, Boechera<br />

ophira, and Ipomopsis congesta var. nevadensis had<br />

reported elevational amplitudes of less than 200 m. Two<br />

taxa, Primula capillaris and Penstemon rhizomatosus,<br />

had reported elevational amplitudes of 381 m and 366<br />

m, respectively. The remaining five taxa, Viola lithion,<br />

Eriogonum holmgrenii, Potentilla cottami, Polemonium<br />

chartaceum, and Cymopterus goodrichii had reported<br />

elevational amplitudes between 747 m and 1,158 m.<br />

Only three, Polemonium chartaceum, Eriogonum holmgrenii,<br />

and Draba serpentina, were restricted to sites<br />

above treeline (Figure 2).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Overview<br />

Many of the rarest plant taxa in the Great Basin of<br />

Nevada are found below the lower limits of tree distribution.<br />

These low elevation taxa (median elevation below<br />

2,000 m) had the narrowest bioclimatic envelope, as<br />

estimated from their reported elevational amplitudes,<br />

with 11 of 14 (79 percent) spanning less than 244 m. If<br />

other elevation bands are considered, 17 of the 20 taxa<br />

(85 percent) with an elevational span of less than 280 m<br />

have a median elevation below 2,377 m (Figure 2).<br />

Among the ten highest elevation taxa, only three (30<br />

percent) have a reported elevational amplitude of less<br />

than 200 m (one of these is likely more widely distributed<br />

as discussed below), and four of them (40 percent)<br />

are known to occur over more than 700 m of elevation.<br />

These results oppose the prediction that alpine species<br />

are at particular risk due to isolation and lack of an<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!