23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

in the town of Shiprock near plant locations range from<br />

a high/low in January (coldest month) of 44.4 o F/17 o F to<br />

a high/low in July (hottest month) of 95 o F/58 o F (Ladyman<br />

2004). The federal listing of Mesa Verde cactus<br />

provides detailed information on habitat, soil and climatic<br />

requirements of the plant, providing great detail to<br />

compare to model data.<br />

Mesa Verde Cactus has 208 species location points.<br />

Models were developed using 146 for model training<br />

and 62 for model test validation points. The full, pruned<br />

and topo models were used to analyze suitable habitat<br />

for Mesa Verde cactus. The AUC score of the full<br />

model, incorporating all of the environmental variables,<br />

was 0.9977. The AUC score of the pruned model, developed<br />

from jackknife analysis, was 0.997. The pruned<br />

model showed geology as the highest predictive vari-<br />

able. In comparison, the topo model AUC score was<br />

0.831. The accuracy of the three niche models measured<br />

by AUC scores, demonstrated that all three models performed<br />

better than random (AUC 0.5). The full and<br />

pruned models were nearly identical in AUC scores<br />

(0.9977, 0.997). The topo model was out performed by<br />

both the full and pruned models.<br />

Variable isolation during jackknife analysis indicated<br />

geology, minimum temperature of coldest month, mean<br />

temperature of coldest quarter and temperature seasonality<br />

were the most predictive variables, with an AUC of<br />

0.9 or above (Table 3). Variable inclusion during jackknife<br />

analysis did not show any significant results; the<br />

AUC scores only changed 0.001 between models. The<br />

least predictive variable was slope aspect.<br />

Table 3: Mesa Verde Cactus model AUC scores.<br />

Sclerocactus mesae-verdae Jackknife Variable Exclusion Jackknife Variable Isolation<br />

#Training samples 146 AUC without Geology 0.997 AUC with only Slope Aspect 0.5824<br />

Iterations 500 AUC without BIO 4 0.9974 AUC with only BIO 2 0.6194<br />

Training AUC 0.9977 AUC without BIO 1 0.9975 AUC with only Slope Angle 0.7073<br />

#Test samples 62 AUC without BIO 10 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 12 0.7626<br />

Test AUC 0.9977 AUC without BIO 11 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 19 0.7773<br />

AUC Standard Deviation 0.0005 AUC without BIO 13 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 17 0.7802<br />

AUC without BIO 16 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 14 0.7907<br />

AUC without BIO 17 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 5 0.8222<br />

AUC without BIO 18 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 18 0.834<br />

AUC without BIO 19 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 13 0.8354<br />

AUC without BIO 8 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 16 0.8423<br />

AUC without BIO 9 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 7 0.8472<br />

AUC without BIO 12 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 3 0.8556<br />

AUC without BIO 14 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 10 0.8608<br />

AUC without BIO 15 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 1 0.8774<br />

AUC without BIO 2 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 9 0.8813<br />

AUC without BIO 3 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 8 0.8919<br />

AUC without BIO 5 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 15 0.8961<br />

AUC without BIO 6 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 4 0.9141<br />

AUC without BIO 7 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 11 0.9169<br />

AUC without Slope Angle 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 6 0.9655<br />

AUC without Slope Aspect 0.9976 AUC with only Geology 0.9888<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!