December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />
in the town of Shiprock near plant locations range from<br />
a high/low in January (coldest month) of 44.4 o F/17 o F to<br />
a high/low in July (hottest month) of 95 o F/58 o F (Ladyman<br />
2004). The federal listing of Mesa Verde cactus<br />
provides detailed information on habitat, soil and climatic<br />
requirements of the plant, providing great detail to<br />
compare to model data.<br />
Mesa Verde Cactus has 208 species location points.<br />
Models were developed using 146 for model training<br />
and 62 for model test validation points. The full, pruned<br />
and topo models were used to analyze suitable habitat<br />
for Mesa Verde cactus. The AUC score of the full<br />
model, incorporating all of the environmental variables,<br />
was 0.9977. The AUC score of the pruned model, developed<br />
from jackknife analysis, was 0.997. The pruned<br />
model showed geology as the highest predictive vari-<br />
able. In comparison, the topo model AUC score was<br />
0.831. The accuracy of the three niche models measured<br />
by AUC scores, demonstrated that all three models performed<br />
better than random (AUC 0.5). The full and<br />
pruned models were nearly identical in AUC scores<br />
(0.9977, 0.997). The topo model was out performed by<br />
both the full and pruned models.<br />
Variable isolation during jackknife analysis indicated<br />
geology, minimum temperature of coldest month, mean<br />
temperature of coldest quarter and temperature seasonality<br />
were the most predictive variables, with an AUC of<br />
0.9 or above (Table 3). Variable inclusion during jackknife<br />
analysis did not show any significant results; the<br />
AUC scores only changed 0.001 between models. The<br />
least predictive variable was slope aspect.<br />
Table 3: Mesa Verde Cactus model AUC scores.<br />
Sclerocactus mesae-verdae Jackknife Variable Exclusion Jackknife Variable Isolation<br />
#Training samples 146 AUC without Geology 0.997 AUC with only Slope Aspect 0.5824<br />
Iterations 500 AUC without BIO 4 0.9974 AUC with only BIO 2 0.6194<br />
Training AUC 0.9977 AUC without BIO 1 0.9975 AUC with only Slope Angle 0.7073<br />
#Test samples 62 AUC without BIO 10 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 12 0.7626<br />
Test AUC 0.9977 AUC without BIO 11 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 19 0.7773<br />
AUC Standard Deviation 0.0005 AUC without BIO 13 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 17 0.7802<br />
AUC without BIO 16 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 14 0.7907<br />
AUC without BIO 17 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 5 0.8222<br />
AUC without BIO 18 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 18 0.834<br />
AUC without BIO 19 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 13 0.8354<br />
AUC without BIO 8 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 16 0.8423<br />
AUC without BIO 9 0.9975 AUC with only BIO 7 0.8472<br />
AUC without BIO 12 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 3 0.8556<br />
AUC without BIO 14 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 10 0.8608<br />
AUC without BIO 15 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 1 0.8774<br />
AUC without BIO 2 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 9 0.8813<br />
AUC without BIO 3 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 8 0.8919<br />
AUC without BIO 5 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 15 0.8961<br />
AUC without BIO 6 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 4 0.9141<br />
AUC without BIO 7 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 11 0.9169<br />
AUC without Slope Angle 0.9976 AUC with only BIO 6 0.9655<br />
AUC without Slope Aspect 0.9976 AUC with only Geology 0.9888<br />
73