23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

ger cluster of A. lentiginosus var. palans. Also, the inflated<br />

members of A. lentiginosus sampled (see Figure<br />

3: A. lentiginosus var. araneosus, A; versus A. lentiginosus<br />

var. stramineus, T) in this study are also spread an<br />

equivalent distance apart. The presence of a yellow<br />

flower and cylindrical pods contributed highly to the A.<br />

lentiginosus var. maricopae group. Though the flower<br />

color of A. lentiginosus var. maricopae was reported by<br />

Barneby (1964) to be ochroleucous in the type description,<br />

field observations in 2005 and 2006 revealed that<br />

the flower is yellow to light yellow in color, but not as<br />

deep a yellow as that found in European Astragalus,<br />

Thermopsis, or Trifolium. Ochroleucous flowers in Astragalus<br />

tend to have a cream tint and dry a whitish-tan,<br />

or tend to be distinctly white, basally, and grade to a<br />

yellowish tint, apically, especially in age. The flower<br />

color, the distinctiveness of the pod morphology, and<br />

the range disjunction could be utilized as support for a<br />

species-level delimitation for this taxon. However, A.<br />

lentiginosus var. maricopae is not the only variety in<br />

this complex with yellowish flowers. Though some individuals<br />

of the southern California endemic, A. lentiginosus<br />

var. nigricalycis M.E. Jones, seem to have creamish<br />

to greenish-white flowers, most have yellow flowers<br />

that dry to a darker yellow in age. Also, A. lentiginosus<br />

var. bryantii has pods that are narrower, longer, and<br />

more tubular than those in A. lentiginosus var. maricopae<br />

(see the taxonomic treatment below for more specific<br />

morphological differences). When considering<br />

both the genetic and morphological data, A. lentiginosus<br />

var. maricopae is just one of several taxa at the extreme<br />

edge of the range of variation in A. lentiginosus and one<br />

of the most morphologically distinct varieties in the<br />

Palantia.<br />

In contrast, Astragalus lentiginosus var. ursinus is<br />

genetically distinct from its nearest relative, A. lentiginosus<br />

var. mokiacensis (Alexander 2008, Alexander &<br />

Liston, in prep). The two are, however, much more sim-<br />

Table 5. Results of 43 specimen Astragalus lentiginosus var. mokiacensis PCoA. This analysis used 12<br />

variable characters. Each is listed in the Kendall rank correlations below.<br />

Eigenvalues<br />

1 2<br />

1.78 0.43<br />

Percent of Total Variance Explained<br />

48.4 11.69<br />

Kendall rank correlations and probabilities<br />

(between PCoA coordinates and morphological characters, significance of p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!