December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Utah Native Plant Society Table 1. continued Taxon Voucher County State Location Detail 192 N DNA content (pg) P. longifolia CF 617 Beaver Co. UT 1 15.25 4X P. longifolia CF 606 Lincoln Co. WY 1 14.51 4X P. stansburyi var. brevifolia P. stansburyi var. brevifolia P. stansburyi var. brevifolia P. stansburyi var. brevifolia P. stansburyi var. brevifolia P. stansburyi ssp. stansburyi P. stansburyi ssp. stansburyi SDF 50208-2 Yavapi Co. AZ 4 8.60 2X SDF 50308-2 Yavapi Co. AZ 3 9.18 2X SDF 50508-3 Coconino Co. AZ 4 9.63 2X CF 630 Mono Co. CA 1 8.31 2X CF 718 Kane Co. UT 1 10.49 2X SDF 42808-1 Cochise Co. AZ 3 8.18 2X SCS 18 Lander Co. NV 1 15.85 4X P. stansburyi ssp. superba SDF 50908-2 Coconino Co. AZ 3 18.86 4X P. stansburyi ssp. superba CF 634 Inyo Co. CA 1 10.54 2X P. stansburyi ssp. superba CF 704 Nye Co. NV 1 7.31 2X P. stansburyi ssp. superba CF 705 Nye Co. NV 1 12.01 2X P. stansburyi ssp. superba CF 713 Nye Co. NV 1 15.69 4X P. stansburyi ssp. superba CF 707 White Pine Co. NV 1 18.87 4X P. amabilis CF 780 Yavapai Co. AZ Camp Woods 1 8.28 2X P. amabilis CF 775 / SDF 51507-2 Yavapai Co. AZ Thumb Butte 3 8.41 2X b P. amabilis SDF 51707-1 Mojave Co. AZ Black Rock 1 8.81 2X P. amabilis SDF 51807-2 / 50708-4 Mojave Co. AZ Death Valley Spring 5 16.92 4X P. amabilis SDF 50208-4 Yavapai Co. AZ Watson Lake 2 17.58 4X P. amabilis SDF 50308-1 Yavapai Co. AZ Mingus Mtn 4 24.52 6X b P. amabilis SDF 51407-2 Coconino Co. AZ Hobble Mtn 3 24.54 6X P. amabilis SDF 50508-1 Coconino Co. AZ Kaibab Lake 3 26.36 6X P. woodhousei CF 770 Coconino Co. AZ Oakcreek 1 8.81 2X P. woodhousei SDF 50108-3 Coconino Co. AZ Stoneman 3 8.89 2X b P. woodhousei SDF 51407-1 Coconino Co. AZ Bill Williams 1 9.02 2X P. woodhousei SDF 50807-1 Catron Co. NM Reserve 1 16.50 4X P. woodhousei SDF 50108-1 Gila Co. AZ McFadden Peak 5 16.89 4X Cytotype
Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 Table 1. continued Taxon Voucher County State Location Detail N DNA content (pg) P. woodhousei SDF 42908-2 Navajo Co. AZ Showlow 3 17.76 4X P. woodhousei SDF 50108-2 Coconino Co. AZ Strawberry 6 18.13 4X b P. woodhousei SDF 43008-2 Gila Co. AZ Sharp Creek 8 20.06 4X P. woodhousei SDF 51107-2 Gila Co. AZ Sierra Ancha 1 27.16 6X a inferred ploidy level supported by published mitotic chromosome count from the same population (Löve, 1971; counted by Daniel J. Crawford; a voucher specimen from New York Botanical Garden [Crawford 76, June 1970] was also consulted). b inferred ploidy level supported by meitoic chromosome counts conducted in laboratories of the authors. Cytotype tetraploid populations located in the northern portion of the range and diploid populations located in the southern portion of the range. Cytotype in some populations of P. stansburyi subsp. superba could not be reliably determined due to wide variation in DNA content, and further study of this taxon is needed. This preliminary survey indicates that cytotype variation may be a useful character for clarifying historically complicated tax- onomic divisions (as suggested by Kron et al. 2007) among these Phlox species. An in-depth survey of cytotype variation in P. amabilis and P. woodhousei revealed that these species were made up of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid populations and that some cytotypes were restricted to specific portions of the range (Table 1; Figure 1). For example, most populations of P. woodhousei were associ- Figure 1. Map showing the locations and ploidy levels of 18 populations of Phlox amabilis and P. woodhousei sampled for this study. 193
Page 1 and 2:
Calochortiana December 2012 Number
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Species # Training Samples Calochor
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
case of the former lake beds a duri
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
A. lentiginosus var. ursinus (publi
Page 141 and 142: Calochortiana December 2012 Number
Page 191: Calochortiana December 2012 Number
Page 209 and 210: Pot Score Min Score Trend Threat In
show all

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?