23.10.2014 Views

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

December 2012 Number 1 - Utah Native Plant Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Calochortiana <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1<br />

Mexico. The dramatic and almost complete demise of<br />

aridland ciénegas from aquifer depletion in the Chihuahuan<br />

Desert of Texas left only two populations of Pecos<br />

sunflower in a region that probably contained several.<br />

Some of the New Mexico populations are also damaged<br />

or threatened by aquifer depletion and nearly all are degraded<br />

by exotic tree infestations (USDI-Fish & Wildlife<br />

2008). Pecos sunflower was listed as a federally<br />

threatened species in 1999 and its ciénega habitats are<br />

finally receiving some management attention specific to<br />

the needs of this plant.<br />

Wright’s marsh thistle (Cirsium wrightii A. Gray)<br />

sometimes occurs in the same New Mexican ciénegas<br />

occupied by Pecos sunflower, but there appear to be<br />

fewer thistle populations in the United States. It ranges<br />

from southeastern New Mexico to southeastern Arizona<br />

and northern Chihuahua and Sonora. The type locality<br />

and single Arizona location at San Bernardino Ciénega<br />

has not been seen again since that ciénega was dried by<br />

down-cutting of the adjacent Black Draw. Some New<br />

Mexico populations at Lake Valley, Sacramento Mountain<br />

springs, and the City of Roswell (Country Club)<br />

have also been extirpated (New Mexico Rare <strong>Plant</strong><br />

Technical Council 1999, Sivinski 1995, 2005). This is<br />

clearly a threatened ciénega species in the United States;<br />

however, the status of this plant in México is unknown.<br />

A dismal trend of aridland spring loss in México (Contreras<br />

and Lozano 2002, Unmack and Minckley 2008)<br />

offers little hope that this species is faring better south<br />

of the border. Cirsium mohavense (Greene) Petrak<br />

(synonym = Cirsium virginense Welsh) is a related wetland<br />

thistle that may be occupying the same sinking ship<br />

in the Mojave Desert except that the Mojave thistle is<br />

not exclusively a ciénega plant and also occurs in some<br />

hanging garden and riparian habitats (<strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Native</strong> <strong>Plant</strong><br />

<strong>Society</strong> 2008).<br />

Leoncita false foxglove (Agalinus calycina Pennell)<br />

also co-occurs with Pecos sunflower and Wright’s<br />

marsh thistle in a ciénega at Bitter Lake National Wildlife<br />

Refuge in southeastern New Mexico. It is otherwise<br />

only known from an extant population at the Diamond<br />

Y Spring ciénega in western Texas, another historic and<br />

ambiguous collection in western Texas, and an historic<br />

collection in Coahuila (Poole et al. 2007). This is another<br />

species with almost no data available on its status<br />

in México. It seems to be exceedingly rare, but much<br />

additional research must be accomplished to support the<br />

initial appearance of rarity.<br />

Additional botanical surveys of all ciénegas in the<br />

southwestern United States and northern México will be<br />

needed to fully understand ciénega plant distributions<br />

and the threats to their habitats. Botanists should consult<br />

southwestern ichthyologists, herpetologists and aquatic<br />

invertebrate biologists who have been much more ag-<br />

gressive in locating and gaining access to aridland<br />

springs. They can help determine which springs support<br />

ciénega habitats and may already know many of the<br />

landowners.<br />

MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES<br />

Some remnant southwestern ciénegas have been acquired<br />

by federal and state governments and The Nature<br />

Conservancy as natural preserves or wildlife refuges.<br />

These have usually been protected because of the rare or<br />

endangered animals inhabiting the actual spring features,<br />

but the rare ciénega plants also need to be considered<br />

in preserve management. Ciénegas are productive<br />

and dynamic biotic communities that have attracted use<br />

by large herbivores for millions of years. A protective<br />

fence and hands-off approach for preserve management<br />

may only yield a ciénega that is overgrown, thatchy,<br />

drying, and pest-ridden (Kodric-Brown and Brown<br />

2007, Unmack and Minckley 2008). Needs for grazing<br />

or fire prescriptions, aquifer protection or restoration,<br />

and weed control calls for active management.<br />

Restoration and management of ciénegas affected by<br />

arroyo cuts that have lowered the potentiometric surface<br />

of adjacent springs and seeps will require the very difficult<br />

task of aggrading incised channels (Minckley and<br />

Brunelle 2007, Turner and Fonseca 2008). The ground<br />

water of a dead or damaged ciénega may still be close to<br />

the surface, but requires significant sedimentation and<br />

restoration of sheet flow to bring the potentiometric surface<br />

back to ground level and re-establish a “living” ciénega.<br />

On the other hand, former ciénegas supported by<br />

spring aquifers that have been depleted by groundwater<br />

pumping are unlikely to resume surface flow and become<br />

“living” again for the foreseeable future.<br />

Blue Hole Ciénega in Santa Rosa, New Mexico was<br />

purchased by the State Forestry Division’s Endangered<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Program in 2005 to preserve critical habitat for the<br />

endangered Pecos sunflower and Wright’s marsh thistle.<br />

This 116-acre ciénega was about one-third infested with<br />

Russian olive trees (plus salt cedar to a lesser extent),<br />

suddenly ungrazed by livestock, and illustrative of some<br />

vegetation management challenges in a ciénega preserve<br />

(Figures 3 and 4).<br />

Weed tree control was an immediate concern because<br />

the entire ciénega was rapidly trending towards Russian<br />

olive woodland. Inmate work crews with chainsaws and<br />

backpack herbicide sprayers spent a total of 3,600 manhours<br />

cutting trees, spraying stumps, and broadcasting<br />

slash during the late summer and autumn months when<br />

the soil surface was dry over much of the ciénega. Winter<br />

to summer was an unsuitable period for weed control<br />

because effective herbicides could not be used while the<br />

soil surface was constantly wet or pooling water. The<br />

initial percent kill for tree stumps was about 80%.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!