Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...
Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...
Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 API STANDARD 65-2<br />
these problems. ECD increase in high-angle and horiz<strong>on</strong>tal wellbore secti<strong>on</strong>s should be addressed in the plan, as the<br />
formati<strong>on</strong> fracture gradient will remain c<strong>on</strong>stant in the horiz<strong>on</strong>tal secti<strong>on</strong> of the well while fluid fricti<strong>on</strong> pressure will<br />
increase.<br />
Numerous well design parameters can impact ECD including the use of casing strings with increased annular<br />
clearances, use of liners rather than full casing strings, selecting fluids that reduce fricti<strong>on</strong>al losses, expandable<br />
tubulars to preserve hole size, and c<strong>on</strong>trolling ROP to avoid overloading the annulus with cuttings. Critical circulating<br />
and swab pressures should be documented in the plan. A wellbore hydraulics simulator should be used <strong>on</strong> each well.<br />
B.2.6.2 Wellbore Cleaning<br />
Cuttings transport to the surface is primarily c<strong>on</strong>trolled by annular velocity and fluid rheology, so care should be taken<br />
when selecting comp<strong>on</strong>ents that impact these parameters. Surface drilling equipment (drilling fluid pumps, flow lines,<br />
and shakers) should be sized to accommodate the maximum rate of cuttings generated. Hole deviati<strong>on</strong> should be<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered when designing higher annular velocities for proper hole cleaning. Ensure chemical compatibility of the<br />
formati<strong>on</strong> and the drilling fluid system to avoid swelling problems. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> bit nozzle selecti<strong>on</strong> should be based <strong>on</strong><br />
optimizing ROP, bit cleaning, and annular velocity for transport of solids to the surface. It is recommended that a<br />
wellbore hydraulics/hole cleaning simulati<strong>on</strong> model be run <strong>on</strong> each well to determine minimum and maximum flow<br />
rates. Maximum pipe-tripping speed should be c<strong>on</strong>trolled to avoid creati<strong>on</strong> of excess swab/surge pressure during<br />
hole cleaning operati<strong>on</strong>s. Wells drilled from floating vessels should c<strong>on</strong>sider the use of a booster line when high solids<br />
loading is expected in the riser.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al hole cleaning tactics may have to be supplemented with hole cleaning pills under certain c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Viscous pills and high weight pills can be effective at removing cuttings. However, the use of some pills can<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminate the drilling fluid system.<br />
B.2.7 Barrier Design<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> operati<strong>on</strong>al goal of any well design is to provide sufficient barriers between formati<strong>on</strong>s and between those<br />
formati<strong>on</strong>s and the surface. A well’s barrier plan should include maintaining well c<strong>on</strong>trol via hydrostatic pressure from<br />
fluids, selecti<strong>on</strong> and use of well c<strong>on</strong>trol equipment, and the placement of cement or other mechanical barriers in the<br />
well. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> well design (i.e. wellhead, BOP equipment, riser, etc.) should c<strong>on</strong>sider including a minimum of two barriers<br />
available during any operati<strong>on</strong> to prevent unc<strong>on</strong>trolled flow from the well to the envir<strong>on</strong>ment. If an operati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
performed with fewer than two physical barriers in place, then operati<strong>on</strong>al barriers become critical. See industry well<br />
design documents for more informati<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> barrier design should c<strong>on</strong>sider incorporating the following elements:<br />
— ability to withstand the maximum anticipated wellbore pressure,<br />
— ability to be tested for functi<strong>on</strong> or leaks,<br />
— failure of a single barrier will not result in unc<strong>on</strong>trolled flow from the well,<br />
— the operating envir<strong>on</strong>ment is within the design specificati<strong>on</strong>s of the barrier element.<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong>, at least <strong>on</strong>e of the barriers should have the capability to do the following.<br />
— Shear any device that passes through the barrier and seal the wellbore after shearing. If this is not possible, an<br />
alternative pressure c<strong>on</strong>trol plan should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />
— Seal the wellbore with any size device penetrating the barrier element. If this is not possible, an alternative<br />
pressure c<strong>on</strong>trol plan should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of the viability of each barrier should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered in the planning process. Plans should address well<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol issues each time a barrier is removed or replaced. For example, after a cement job, the BOP system is