25.01.2015 Views

Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...

Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...

Mr. Erik Milito - The House Committee on Natural Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 API STANDARD 65-2<br />

Critical Drilling fluid Removal Parameters<br />

Displacing the drilling fluid during the cementing operati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>e of the most important factors in isolating a potential flow z<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

Poor drilling fluid displacement will jeopardize the ability to isolate potential flow z<strong>on</strong>es.<br />

Centralizati<strong>on</strong><br />

Mixing and<br />

Placement Rate<br />

Spacer<br />

Fluid Compatibility<br />

Circulati<strong>on</strong> Volume<br />

Rheology<br />

Wiper Plugs<br />

Pipe Movement<br />

Annular Volume<br />

Determinati<strong>on</strong><br />

Centralizer placement simulati<strong>on</strong>s shall be performed in order to best facilitate the installati<strong>on</strong> of a cement<br />

barrier element.<br />

Have the centralizer simulator results been c<strong>on</strong>sidered during the cementing design and executi<strong>on</strong> within<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>straints imposed by hydraulic, operati<strong>on</strong>al, logistical or well architecture limitati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Have placement rates during cementing been modeled and designed to achieve the best possible drilling<br />

fluid removal<br />

Has the spacer been modeled and designed to achieve the best possible drilling fluid removal<br />

Has the spacer been tested for compatibility with drilling fluid and cement according to API RP 10B-2/ISO<br />

10426-2<br />

When using NAF, has the spacer compositi<strong>on</strong> been optimized for wettability according to API RP 10B-2/<br />

ISO 10426-2<br />

As a minimum, does the pre-cementing circulating plan account for actual well c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

— Drilling fluid c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ing and mobility.<br />

— Gas in excess of background levels.<br />

— Wellbore cooling.<br />

— Lost circulati<strong>on</strong>/ballo<strong>on</strong>ing.<br />

— C<strong>on</strong>firm float equipment is free of obstructi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

— Hole stability.<br />

Has altering the drilling fluid’s static and dynamic properties after drilling the secti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taining the potential<br />

flow z<strong>on</strong>e been c<strong>on</strong>sidered to improve drilling fluid displacement efficiency and/or ECD management<br />

Do the fluids’ rheological profiles provide a fricti<strong>on</strong> pressure hierarchy appropriate for effective drilling fluid<br />

removal<br />

If possible, are top and bottom wiper plugs used<br />

Has pipe movement been c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

Has c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> been given for how the open hole volume will be determined

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!