We All are Europe - AESAEC
We All are Europe - AESAEC
We All are Europe - AESAEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evaluation of project meetings: The evaluation of project meetings or mobility phases is a must in<br />
each transnational project. The following tool might help you.<br />
Project title:<br />
Objective of evaluation:<br />
Organisation:<br />
Project meeting<br />
Please give your opinion about the project meeting by following the scoring system below as well<br />
as by providing the evaluator with some written comments!<br />
☺☺ = very positive; ☺ = positive; = neither positive /nor negative ; ☹ = negative; ☹☹ = very negative;<br />
NA= not applicable<br />
Issues ☺☺ ☺ ☹ ☹☹ NA Comments:<br />
Q1) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the preparation work for this meeting<br />
(E.g. quantity and quality of information flow before the meeting;<br />
communication management from promoter and / or hotel etc.)<br />
Q2) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the seminar room<br />
(E.g. location, equipment, size, table structure etc.)<br />
Q3) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the agenda for the meeting<br />
(E.g. time structure, involvement of partners, appropriateness of<br />
methods and issues etc.)<br />
Q4) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information and materials you<br />
received during the meeting concerning the content and<br />
structure of the project (E.g. work, dissemination and evaluation<br />
plans; aims and objectives of project etc.)<br />
Q5) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information you received during<br />
the meeting concerning the financial and administrative issues<br />
of the project<br />
(E.g. information about reporting system, contracts, payments, budgets<br />
etc.)<br />
Q6) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information you received concerning<br />
next project steps and <strong>are</strong> you aw<strong>are</strong> what kind of contributions<br />
will be expected from you<br />
Q7) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the working atmosphere during the<br />
meeting (E.g. did everyone have an opportunity to contribute properly<br />
and equally to this project meeting Was everyone’s opinion heard<br />
and respected etc.)<br />
Q8) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the way the meeting was managed<br />
(E.g. communication, moderation and social skills; time, crisis / conflict<br />
management etc.)<br />
Q9) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the quantity and quality of the contributions<br />
made by other partners at this meeting<br />
Q10) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the social activities and atmosphere<br />
of this meeting<br />
Q11) Do you think the meeting was generally successful Do you<br />
think the project group was able to achieve relevant results<br />
and to make some progress with its work<br />
Q12) After your impressions and experiences at the kick-off<br />
meeting and the starting phase, do you still think it was a<br />
great idea to join this project<br />
What do you expect to be positive:<br />
Q13) Looking ahead to the next steps of the project, do you feel<br />
the project will see positive or negative developments<br />
(E.g. What kind of threats, risks as well as chances, opportunities etc.<br />
do you see Is there anything to be done, changed, avoided etc. in order<br />
for you to feel happier with this project)<br />
What do you expect to be negative:<br />
Q14) If there is anything else you would like to add or if there is a<br />
relevant issue not mentioned in this questionnaire, please feel<br />
free to tell us using this space:<br />
Thank you very much for your effort!<br />
134