We All are Europe - AESAEC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of project meetings: The evaluation of project meetings or mobility phases is a must in each transnational project. The following tool might help you. Project title: Objective of evaluation: Organisation: Project meeting Please give your opinion about the project meeting by following the scoring system below as well as by providing the evaluator with some written comments! ☺☺ = very positive; ☺ = positive; = neither positive /nor negative ; ☹ = negative; ☹☹ = very negative; NA= not applicable Issues ☺☺ ☺ ☹ ☹☹ NA Comments: Q1) Were you satisfied with the preparation work for this meeting (E.g. quantity and quality of information flow before the meeting; communication management from promoter and / or hotel etc.) Q2) Were you satisfied with the seminar room (E.g. location, equipment, size, table structure etc.) Q3) Were you satisfied with the agenda for the meeting (E.g. time structure, involvement of partners, appropriateness of methods and issues etc.) Q4) Were you satisfied with all information and materials you received during the meeting concerning the content and structure of the project (E.g. work, dissemination and evaluation plans; aims and objectives of project etc.) Q5) Were you satisfied with all information you received during the meeting concerning the financial and administrative issues of the project (E.g. information about reporting system, contracts, payments, budgets etc.) Q6) Were you satisfied with all information you received concerning next project steps and are you aware what kind of contributions will be expected from you Q7) Were you satisfied with the working atmosphere during the meeting (E.g. did everyone have an opportunity to contribute properly and equally to this project meeting Was everyone’s opinion heard and respected etc.) Q8) Were you satisfied with the way the meeting was managed (E.g. communication, moderation and social skills; time, crisis / conflict management etc.) Q9) Were you satisfied with the quantity and quality of the contributions made by other partners at this meeting Q10) Were you satisfied with the social activities and atmosphere of this meeting Q11) Do you think the meeting was generally successful Do you think the project group was able to achieve relevant results and to make some progress with its work Q12) After your impressions and experiences at the kick-off meeting and the starting phase, do you still think it was a great idea to join this project What do you expect to be positive: Q13) Looking ahead to the next steps of the project, do you feel the project will see positive or negative developments (E.g. What kind of threats, risks as well as chances, opportunities etc. do you see Is there anything to be done, changed, avoided etc. in order for you to feel happier with this project) What do you expect to be negative: Q14) If there is anything else you would like to add or if there is a relevant issue not mentioned in this questionnaire, please feel free to tell us using this space: Thank you very much for your effort! 134
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully Workflow monitoring instrument: The following evaluation grid may help you to keep a better overview of the workflow in your project. At the end of the day this is the most critical task of a project manager! The instrument is easy to use. List on the left hand side (pink) of the template all the tasks and expected results in chronological order, and gauge, by ticking off or commenting on the right hand side (blue), whether or not they have been fulfilled in time and according to the frameworks set by the proposal or partnership agreements. Workflow Monitoring Instrument Expected tasks / results Short description (if appropriate) Deadline Partners involved Status (e.g. already started, in process, completed, cancelled; comments etc.) 135
Page 1:
We All We All are Europe Participat
Page 4 and 5:
Publisher/Editor: AESAEC Project Gr
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Part A: The Pedagogical Co
Page 9:
Module 7 - How to implement a proje
Page 13 and 14:
The conceptual framework I. The con
Page 15 and 16:
The conceptual framework closed one
Page 17 and 18:
The conceptual framework c) The urg
Page 19 and 20:
The conceptual framework Kroehnert,
Page 21 and 22:
Findings of the IANUS project Stru
Page 23 and 24:
Authentic Location Learning, Multi-
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27:
Page 31 and 32:
Module 1 - The European Union and i
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Module 2 - The Concept of Active Eu
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Module 3 - The Europe for Citizens
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Module 4 - The Grundtvig Initiative
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84: Module 4 - The Grundtvig Initiative
Page 85 and 86: Module 5 - The Art of Successful Pr
Page 117 and 118: Module 7 - How to Implement a Proje
Page 127 and 128: Attendance List for Project Meeting
Page 133: Module 7 - How to Implement a Proje
Page 141 and 142: AESAEC - Glossary AESAEC - Glossary
Page 143 and 144: AESAEC - Glossary European Economic
Page 145 and 146: AESAEC - Glossary mostly operating
Page 147: AESAEC - Glossary Think tanks Valor
show all

We All are Europe - AESAEC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?