15.02.2015 Views

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.2.2 Corruption of public servants<br />

Scope<br />

Corruption of public servants is considered to be the misuse of public servant<br />

powers to perform an act or omit that act for the benefit of a third party,<br />

as a result of which personal gain is obtained in the form of financial or other<br />

favours. In this NTA, the ‘third party’ mainly refers to representatives of criminal<br />

organisations. The corrupt actions and omissions of the public servants involved<br />

are aimed at benefiting the criminal organisations. Not all forms of public<br />

servant corruption are discussed here: we will limit ourselves to corruption in the<br />

police forces, the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee and the Customs Service.<br />

General context<br />

Police<br />

Newspaper articles sometimes give the idea that criminals with a large bag of<br />

money go looking for potentially corruptible police officers, who are then bribed<br />

to supply information or to put an investigation on the wrong track. The experts<br />

interviewed have stated that this picture is fiction. Whilst criminals are always<br />

interested in contacts that could supply them with relevant information, there<br />

is no indication that criminals actively recruit such contacts, although they will<br />

seize the opportunity if it occurs. However, this does not change the fact that<br />

explicit attempts are made by organised criminal groups to recruit police officers<br />

as sources of information. The amounts of money involved are usually relatively<br />

small. Quite often the amounts for which people risk their careers are only a few<br />

thousand euros. Nevertheless, they still do so because there are other interests<br />

at stake, such as investing in friendship, family or love.<br />

In many of the cases identified there has been an existing relationship that was<br />

a (sometimes indirect) link to criminals. The pattern found in a large number<br />

of cases is that someone is enticed into supplying relatively unimportant<br />

information such as the name of the person who is the registered owner<br />

of a particular vehicle. Slowly but surely, the criminal contact then increases his<br />

grip on the supplier of information. The supplier may even end up participating<br />

in criminal activities.<br />

Apart from obtaining information from police officers (sometimes in return for<br />

money), it is theoretically possible for criminals to have someone from their own<br />

network infiltrate the investigating agencies with the aim of obtaining a position<br />

with access to information or of otherwise sabotaging criminal investigations.<br />

This will not occur more than incidentally, as infiltration is very time-consuming.<br />

Criminal organisations have much more efficient ways of obtaining information.<br />

It is not always guaranteed that a consideration will be provided in return for<br />

information, and if a consideration is provided, it does not have to be provided<br />

180 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Threat</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 2008 – <strong>Organised</strong> crime

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!