15.02.2015 Views

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

National Threat Assessment 2008. Organised Crime - Politie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

section. As it was not studied explicitly, it will not be possible to answer all the<br />

questions. The question about the scale of the phenomenon in particular will<br />

have to remain unanswered. We will therefore limit ourselves to a description<br />

of the types, a few practical examples, the possible consequences and the<br />

final conclusion.<br />

Without attempting to formulate a watertight definition, we can describe<br />

corruption in the business community as ‘the incidental and deliberate<br />

participation in or provision of services to criminal organisations, in any way,<br />

by employees and/or employers in the private business community’.<br />

These are people who are not permanent members of a criminal organisation.<br />

If permanent members of criminal organisations use companies, this constitutes<br />

misuse of the companies in question. This subject will be discussed in section<br />

5.6. This present section is about people who are (incidentally) contacted by<br />

members of a criminal organisation for the provision of specific services related<br />

to their field of work.<br />

General context<br />

Corruption in the business community occurs in almost all forms of organised<br />

crime. One of the most obvious examples concerns cargo theft. The research<br />

conducted for this NTA (see section 4.4) revealed that an estimated 80% of<br />

cargo thefts involved ‘help from the inside’. This can vary from leaving a gate<br />

open to providing transport schedules, information about the contents of the<br />

lorries and involvement of the drivers themselves. People in the business<br />

community blame inadequate screening of new staff. However, even though<br />

it never hurts to establish whether future staff have criminal records, this does<br />

not guarantee that corruption will not occur. Not having a criminal record does<br />

not imply that a person is not vulnerable to corruption. It is more important to<br />

use high-quality procedures and impoved data protection. Besides this, it is<br />

unclear whether help from the inside always involves corruption or whether<br />

there are cases of infiltration. In the former case, someone is rewarded for<br />

incidentally providing assistance; in the latter case, a criminal organisation<br />

has had a member infiltrate as an employee.<br />

Schiphol is often mentioned with regard to opportunities for corruption in<br />

the business community. The luggage-handling area is a good example; the<br />

private security firms, hauliers and couriers, and the cleaning companies are<br />

other examples. The corruption at Schiphol usually involves drug smuggling,<br />

human trafficking or human smuggling. Transport hauliers and Customs hauliers<br />

in particular are mentioned as possible targets, as these companies take over<br />

some of the Customs formalities.<br />

chapter 5 – Criminal modus operandi<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!