program plan - Entergy New Orleans, Inc.

More documents

Recommendations

Info

for the majority of end use energy, while fans, pumps, and compressed are also significant end-uses. [Source: Both charts below were derived from the 2012 IRP, Appendix B Potential Study] Chart 21- Commercial Electric End-Use Characterization Water Heating 0% Refrigeration 5% Lighting 39% Space Cooling 29% Appliances & Plug Load 26% Space Heating 1% Chart 22 - Industrial End-Uses Lighting 2% Pumps 17% Other 6% Compressed Air 16% HVAC 5% Fans 21% Drives 33% APPENDIX 14 | P a g e
PG&E SDG&E NYSERDA Oncor AEP - TCC CL&P United Illuminating CNP ConEd Duquesne Light NYSEG Appendix D: Best Practices Review To better understand how the Entergy New Orleans DSM Plan compares with other utility DSM portfolios, as well as the industry as a whole, CLEAResult collected data on program portfolio performance and spending for a sample of 12 utilities. The analysis reviewed utilities with comparable customer counts and sales, neighboring utilities for a regional comparison, and additional utilities located in developed energy efficiency markets. The ENO DSM portfolio was compared against these utilities in terms of its economic efficiency ($/kW, $/kWh), equitability ($/customer), and sophistication (program types offered). The following figures summarize the overall results of this analysis. Table 1: Best Practices Review – Utility Sample Best Practices Review – Utility Criteria Utility Location Type CenterPoint TX Regional Comparison AEP-TCC TX Regional Comparison ConEd NY Advanced Market Connecticut Light & Power CT Advanced Market Duquesne Light Company PA Comparable Size NYSEG NY Advanced Market NYSERDA NY Advanced Market Oncor TX Regional Comparison PG&E CA Advanced Market SDG&E CA Advanced Market United Illuminating Company CT Comparable Size Overall program offerings were benchmarked against the utility sample to assess the extent to which the portfolio offerings matched industry best practices. Our analysis confirmed that the ENO plan offerings are comparable with those offered in more mature markets and in some cases are more comprehensive. Table 2: Matrix of Program Benchmarks ENO Program Portfolio Residential Consumer Products Residential Heating & Cooling Multi-Family Weatherization Low Income Audit & Weatherization APPENDIX 15 | P a g e
Page 1 and 2:
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. 1600 Perd
Page 3 and 4:
Orleans also is engaged in the prov
Page 5 and 6:
implementation and cost recovery pl
Page 8 and 9:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Docket No. U
Page 11 and 12:
Report on Supplemental Implementati
Page 13 and 14:
3-Year Proposal for Energy Smart -
Page 15 and 16:
D. Integrated Resource Plan In orde
Page 17 and 18:
2. Consumer Products: This retail c
Page 19 and 20:
oken out into its own program initi
Page 21 and 22:
CLEAResult. As can be seen from the
Page 23 and 24:
A. Proposed Cost Recovery One alter
Page 25 and 26:
Entergy New Orleans DSM Plan SUBMIT
Page 27 and 28:
Tables & Figures Table 1: 2012 IRP
Page 29 and 30:
and benchmarking, which helps to bu
Page 31 and 32:
Monitor and the Third Party Adminis
Page 33 and 34:
• Customer sales data • Public
Page 35 and 36:
This process culminated with a fina
Page 37 and 38:
Table 5: Residential Benchmarks $/k
Page 39 and 40:
Table 9: Energy Smart New Orleans D
Page 41 and 42:
• Rate and average bill impact an
Page 43 and 44:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Program Incent
Page 45 and 46:
customers take maximum advantage of
Page 47 and 48:
APPENDICES Appendix A: Program Over
Page 49 and 50:
Key elements of Energy Smart Home P
Page 51 and 52:
Net to Gross Ratio 0.8 Utility Leve
Page 53 and 54:
Compact fluorescent light bulbs, li
Page 55 and 56: EM & V The EM & V of the consumer p
Page 57 and 58: Measure Ceiling Insulation Air Seal
Page 59 and 60: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Program Costs
Page 61 and 62: Program implementation includes fin
Page 63 and 64: Program Program Objective Program D
Page 65 and 66: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Program Costs
Page 67 and 68: Tune-Up, Residential $175 $175 Tune
Page 69 and 70: Marketing Marketing to HVAC contrac
Page 71 and 72: Commercial & Industrial Program Des
Page 73 and 74: The target market for the program w
Page 75 and 76: As part of the program roll-out, th
Page 77 and 78: Small Commercial Solutions Year 1 Y
Page 79 and 80: Target Market(s) Eligible Measures
Page 81 and 82: EM & V Evaluation should focus on c
Page 83 and 84: Evaporator Fan 0 10 1,400 0.152 $ 2
Page 85 and 86: Packaged Heat 240 10 1,665 0.8830 $
Page 87 and 88: PC Power 0 4 145 0.0000 $ 10.80 $ 1
Page 89 and 90: Consumer Advanced Power 0 3 87 0.01
Page 91 and 92: Res Heating & Cooling Res Heating &
Page 93 and 94: Thousands Appendix C: Task 2: Marke
Page 95 and 96: Thousands Millions Thousands 500 45
Page 97 and 98: GWh 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 Chart 6
Page 99 and 100: Chart 9 - Residential Cooling Types
Page 101 and 102: In Chart 12 and 13, CLEAResult pull
Page 103 and 104: GWh GWh Chart 15 - Total Forecasted
Page 105: Industrial 2,500 2,450 2,400 2,350
Page 109 and 110: Chart 2: Commercial Forecasted $/kW
Page 111: Chart 6: Commercial Forecasted $/Cu
show all

program plan - Entergy New Orleans, Inc.

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?