22.04.2015 Views

LVXXU

LVXXU

LVXXU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QER Recommendations (continued)<br />

Support the updating and expansion of state energy assurance plans: DOE began a State Energy<br />

Assurance Planning Initiative in 2009 with funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment<br />

Act of 2009. The President’s Fiscal Year 2016 Budget proposes $35 million to establish a State Energy<br />

Assurance grant program to finance state, local, and tribal governments to continue this important<br />

task. DOE should continue a multi-year program of support for state energy assurance plans,<br />

focusing on improving the capacity of states and localities to identify potential energy disruptions,<br />

quantify their impacts, and develop comprehensive plans that respond to those disruptions and<br />

reduce the threat of future disruptions.<br />

• The specific objectives of this initiative should be as follows:<br />

1. Strengthen and expand state, local, and tribal energy assurance planning and resilience<br />

efforts by incorporating innovative technologies and measures to improve resilience.<br />

2. Build state in-house energy assurance expertise.<br />

3. Build regional energy assurance capability to allow states, localities, and tribes to better<br />

identify the potential for energy disruptions, quantify the impacts of those disruptions,<br />

and develop comprehensive mitigation and response plans.<br />

4. Address the disproportionate impacts of potential energy disruptions on vulnerable or<br />

underserved communities.<br />

• Energy assurance plans funded under this recommendation should be continually updated to<br />

reflect changing conditions and new threats and should be tested for adequacy in simulations<br />

or exercises to maintain staff capacity to implement the plans.<br />

• As part of updating the state energy assurance plans, states would be encouraged to work<br />

with industry and each other to identify locations where energy infrastructure is particularly<br />

vulnerable to disruption (e.g., by physical attack) and craft effective strategies to reduce<br />

vulnerability and coordinate preparedness and response plans.<br />

• As part of these plans, states should also assess needs for backup electricity at retail gasoline<br />

stations along emergency evacuation routes.<br />

• DOE should encourage strong intergovernmental coordination to ensure state and local<br />

energy assurance plans interface with one another, as well as with Federal and private sector<br />

disaster and emergency response plans.<br />

• Having a state energy assurance plan that meets a threshold of completeness and rigor<br />

should be an eligibility requirement for other kinds of Federal funding related to energy<br />

infrastructure.<br />

• This program should be supported on either a 2-year or 3-year cycle.<br />

On a 3-year cycle, the estimated support needed for this program over 10 years is $350 million. On a<br />

2-year cycle, the estimated support needed for this program over 10 years is $500 million.<br />

QER Report: Energy Transmission, Storage, and Distribution Infrastructure | April 2015 2-39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!