10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D. Society is a fit subject for scientific study, but first, the absurdities must be identified and eliminated.Hobbes gives central importance to speech. Although speech confers power and aids memory, it also lendsitself to abuses.1. We reason with terms that have no settled meaning. Something about the way in which we representproblems to ourselves in words makes them soluble or not, clear or obscure.2. We fail to distinguish between real bodies and spirituous, immaterial things; we speak <strong>of</strong> “infusingfaith” into somebody, thus signaling pr<strong>of</strong>ound ignorance <strong>of</strong> what can do the infusing and be infused.3. We remain tied to that old Platonic mistake, according to which “universals” are granted realexistence. Only particular things have existence.4. We treat metaphors as if they were real, and we complacently adopt terms for which there are no realworldreferents. The Scholastics are to blame for this.E. Reality is physical reality, material reality. If we are to have a scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> man, then manmust be accepted as a material entity.F. Society, composed <strong>of</strong> such entities, is then understood as a complex system made up <strong>of</strong> (human) matter inmotion.1. Motion is either involuntary and reflexive (“vital”) or intentional.2. Our motives and desires prompt intentional movements; we move toward what we want and awayfrom what we fear or dislike. The root motives are grounded in pleasure versus pain.3. The most fundamental desire is that <strong>of</strong> survival.4. All our moral and ethical standards inherited from philosophy and religion are actually grounded inconsiderations <strong>of</strong> personal survival. Good and evil are not devoid <strong>of</strong> meaning, but they mean simply“pleasure” and “pain.”G. It is fear <strong>of</strong> a violent death that moves us to enter civil society.1. Men gather in groups to prevent their destruction by other men.2. Within society, members differ in ability but are sufficiently equal that no one <strong>of</strong> them could singlyresist the power exerted by a combination <strong>of</strong> them.3. Therefore, they invest a protector with such power as is necessary to protect each <strong>of</strong> them from theothers in the same group. This monarchical power is the “leviathan”—the state.4. We give up enough <strong>of</strong> our power to the monarch that he will have sufficient options to protect us. Butour allegiance to the leviathan—and, hence, the monarch’s power—lasts only as long as he is able toprotect us, our interests, and our lives.III. Hobbes’s entire thesis is based on a hedonistic psychology, and Hobbes is not at all sheepish about stating asmuch.A. In a nutshell, the sovereign has the power <strong>of</strong> reward or punishment. It is by that power that we move—away from punishment and toward reward. What passes for altruism or Christian charity is itself anexpression <strong>of</strong> self-regard and self-preservation, based either on a desire for honor or eternal reward or on afear <strong>of</strong> reprisal.B. Concord in the state is the equivalent <strong>of</strong> health in the body. Sedition is sickness. Ultimately, sedition leadsto civil war, and civil war is death—it kills civic life. These are not metaphors but exact correspondences.IV. Hobbes’s critique <strong>of</strong> Descartes is cogent, and Descartes’s extended reply is not entirely convincing.A. Asked by Marin Mersenne to <strong>of</strong>fer (along with Pierre Gassendi, now known chiefly as the 17 th -centurywriter who revived Epicurean philosophy, and Mersenne himself) a critique <strong>of</strong> Descartes’s work, Hobbestook issue with Descartes’s rationalistic mind/body distinction.B. Instead, Hobbes <strong>of</strong>fers a view <strong>of</strong> human nature as a part <strong>of</strong> nature, subject to the same governing laws. Thetools developed to study and discover the laws and principles <strong>of</strong> nature can be applied to human nature.V. The age <strong>of</strong> Newton came to host increasingly mechanistic conceptions <strong>of</strong> the body politic and <strong>of</strong> society atlarge. Hobbes’s Leviathan illustrates this turn <strong>of</strong> mind vividly. Thus, in this age, the prospects for a socialscience are recognized and considered optimistically. Science now begins to take on a “scientistic” flavor suchthat statements and judgments, in order to be credible, must be rendered in ostensibly scientific fashion. TheEnlightenment is at hand.10©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!