10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. He argues that the former is preferable and that this very preference defeats the claim that the concept<strong>of</strong> beauty is exhausted by the resources <strong>of</strong> experience and feeling or even those <strong>of</strong> human judgment.3. He concludes:We shall have to include in our ultimate end something beyond the limits <strong>of</strong> human existence. I admit,<strong>of</strong> course, that our beautiful world would be better still, if there were human beings in it to contemplateand enjoy its beauty. But that admission makes nothing against my points. If it be once admitted thatthe beautiful world in itself is better than the ugly, then it follows, that however many beings mayenjoy it, and however much better their enjoyment may be than it is itself, yet its mere existence addssomething to the goodness <strong>of</strong> the whole: it is not only a means to our end, but also itself a part there<strong>of</strong>.Recommended Reading:Burke, Edmund. Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin <strong>of</strong> Our <strong>Ideas</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Sublime and Beautiful and Other Pre-Revolutionary Writings. Columbia University Press, 1958.Hume, David. On the Standard <strong>of</strong> Taste. Liberty Fund, 1985.Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica (1903). New York: Prometheus Books, 1988.Questions to Consider:1. Is beauty in the eye <strong>of</strong> the beholder, and if so, what must be assumed about that “eye”?2. Can art ever be totally disinterested in Kant’s sense?3. If genius is innate, why do we praise the genius?36©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!